We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Oct 26 2008 2:15 AM by Avangi. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
eagerness  +  580259 Sun, 26 Oct 08 12:26 AM
Are the below sentences grammaticaly correct?

If people only knew how humble we are.

I did not know what your name is.

I came accross these two sentences while I was reading a book. I am asking this question because in all the books on English grammar I have read so far, both of these sentences are incorrect. Shouldn't am and is have been in the past tense(WERE AND WAS)?

I appreciate your taking the time to respond to my question.

Joined on Tue, Jul 1 2008
New Member 39
AlpheccaStars  +  580260 Sun, 26 Oct 08 12:34 AM
The first sentence is in the subjunctive mood (present tense).

In the second, if you write " what your name was", it implies that you don't have the same name now as you did then. You have changed your name. 

 

Joined on Sun, Oct 12 2008
Senior Member 3,508
The pen is mightier than the sword. Edward Bulwer-Lytton (1803-1873)
Grammar Geek  +  580261 Sun, 26 Oct 08 12:37 AM

Actually, I have a different interpretation.

I didn't know what your name is (and I still don't know).

I didn't know what your name was (although I've since learned it).

But either way, the sentence is correct.

Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member 19,671
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
AlpheccaStars  +  580280 Sun, 26 Oct 08 01:26 AM
 RIght on, GG! Interpretation out of context is dicey at best!
Avangi  +  580288 Sun, 26 Oct 08 02:15 AM
There have been a lot of threads on this subject.  The consensus has been that if we may reasonably assume the condition persists, we may choose either tense, absent context to the contrary.  (Of course, such context would make the assumption unreasonable.)
Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member 8,182
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3614.32638. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.