![]() 'if that was' vs. 'if that were'?3 replies Forums · General English Grammar & Vocabulary, Listening & Speaking · General English Grammar Questions Anonymous: What is more accepted? -- "As if that were not enough . . ." vs. "As if that was not enough . . ." Thanks. AnonymousWhat is more accepted? -- "As if that were not enough . . ." vs. "As if that was not enough . . ." Thanks.I vote for "were", because it is correct, even though many use "was". It is 'were' because this sentence is an example of a conditional sentence. Some 'google' seaching will give you some more insight on conditional sentences. Junior Member78 I would opt for "either", depending on temporal context: 1. And as if that wasn't enough, he even used the jacuzzi. 2. And as if that weren't enough, he even wants her to move in with us. (Though I think most BrE speakers would say "wasn't", in #2.) MrP Veteran Member12,806 ![]() ![]() | Have a question? People are waiting to help. Interesting stuff Related forum topics:What's the rule(s) for I was vs I were?Was versus Were?Were vs. was?If I were vs If I had been?Was vs Were?None of is/are able vs. none of us was/were able?There were or was?I was / I were / He was vs. He were?were there/there were?but for... That were to be?was or were?"if were to" vs "if were"?subjunctive:if it were not vs. if there...If I were ...?where vs. were?There was vs. there were?If it were not for?Were?Were there?• assured that vs. were sure that?Are vs. Were vs. Have Been? |
Online chat is available