Thak you for your replay. BTW, what do you mean by "'Covered in' - Sometimes suggests more complete coverage. Sometimes suggests the coverage was less intentional, more accidental." ??
Could you give me a little more samples or explanation towards this above comments? If it is more complete coverage, how can it be both less intentioanl and more acidental? I would say if it is less intentiaonl but more accidental, it it shuold have less coverage instead of more coverage. Maybe I am wrong, I am not sure,