Forums · General English Grammar & Vocabulary, Listening & Speaking · General English Grammar Questions
People may be asked to do stuff, this includes, but is not limited to, doing X, Y, Z.
To my ear, the sentance sounds fine without "is."
People may be asked to do stuff, including but not limited to X, Y and Z.
YankeeI'm afraid I would take sides with your boss, Lemonizer. However, if you reworded the sentence slightly, you would not need 'is':Amy,
Am I reading this thread right ? If my eyes don't deceive me, I believe the boss is the one insisting on "is" being needed.
LemonizerOk, I'm stumped. My boss feels that "is" is needed in this sentance:Please reread the original post as well as my first post, Goodman. Lemonizer apparently wanted to omit the word "is" from the phrase "includes but is not limited to" and the boss apparently insisted that the word "is" was necessary for that particular wording. I agreed with the boss: The word "is" should be there.
The word "is" is not necessary if the wording is changed to "including but not limited to".
Have you noticed the difference in the two structures now?
Anonymous:I agree with Grammar Geek. The sentence should read as follows:
"People may be asked to do stuff; this includes, but is not limited to, doing X, Y, Z."
"People may be asked to do stuff. This includes, but is not limited to, doing X, Y, Z."
"People may be asked to do stuff including, but not limited to, doing X, Y, Z."
People are waiting to help.
Live chatRegistered users can join here
Related forum topics:
Time is limited...help me with my motivation...Including me vs. Including myself?difference between Company, Limited, and...including me?the limited edition bag?It will include but not limited to?plus vs including?limited success?Including this and that?Limited to three flights of arrows...?Including?Including, inclusive of and includes?There are a limited number of opportunities?...Limited to / limited by?Include or including?"a limited number of" or "limited numbers of"?Limited in?