Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Jul 21 2006 11:39 PM by Jpe. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Inchoateknowledge  +  247586 Fri, 21 Jul 06 10:26 AM
there are some oddities I have just dug up in a grammar book and in which you might be interested:

Marginal modal auxiliaries:

used to, ought to, need, dare

used to:

He usedn't to smoke.
He did not use to smoke.
He used to drink, did he not.
Did he use to drink?

ought to:

Ought I to stop smoking? Yes, you ought (to).
You oughtn't to stop smoking.
You do not ought to stop smoking.

dare, need:

may act as modals and full verbs.
The modal usage is restricted to non-assertive contexts, negatives, to if clauses.


Joined on Wed, May 3 2006
Senior Member 2,549
Beep! Beep! :)
Marius Hancu  +  247614 Fri, 21 Jul 06 01:36 PM
>He usedn't to smoke.
Strange to me, but ... you may enjoy these:-)
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=24673
http://tinyurl.com/ztoew
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Veteran Member 11,673
Goodman  +  247666 Fri, 21 Jul 06 05:21 PM

 Inchoateknowledge wrote:
there are some oddities I have just dug up in a grammar book and in which you might be interested:

Marginal modal auxiliaries:

used to, ought to, need, dare

used to:

He usedn't to smoke.
He did not use to smoke.
He used to drink, did he not.
Did he use to drink?

ought to:

Ought I to stop smoking? Yes, you ought (to).
You oughtn't to stop smoking.
You do not ought to stop smoking.

dare, need:

may act as modals and full verbs.
The modal usage is restricted to non-assertive contexts, negatives, to if clauses.


I think the grammar book you are using is confusing you more than helping you. In m opinion, I think you will probably beneift more by reading Reader Digest.  I never heard people say "usedn't " nor "oughtn't" in my life. To me this is odd-ball English.  

Joined on Mon, Nov 7 2005
Senior Member 3,816
The name says it all!
rvw  +  247672 Fri, 21 Jul 06 05:44 PM
A grammar book I use lists the following as the modal auxiliaries:
can/could
may-might
will/would
shall/should
must
ought
and the following as modal-like auxiliaries:
had better
have got
get (to)
have (to)
be able
be supposed
be bound
I've never heard of usedn't, or You do not ought to stop smoking.  I would say He used to not smoke and You should not stop smoking.
rvw
Joined on Sun, Nov 28 2004
Woodstock, Georgia, USA
Full Member 350
Inchoateknowledge, 3 yr 110 days ago
This is the book I study from.

Jpe, 3 yr 110 days ago

"oughtn't" is still used in BrEng. Not sure about "usedn't," though.  

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.