[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Feb 20 2004 7:28 PM by Guest. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Guest  +  23004 Fri, 20 Feb 04 07:28 PM
Do you know any company that ships cars for cheap?
Chameleon  +  23009 Fri, 20 Feb 04 10:40 PM
Not quite right... This is better:

"Do you know any company that ships cars cheaply?"

OR

"Do you know any company that ships cars for a low price?"

Cheap is an adjective, not a noun. So it cannot be the object of a preposition.
Joined on Wed, Feb 18 2004
Full Member 174
rommie  +  23048 Sat, 21 Feb 04 12:32 PM
Chameleon's answer is spot on, but their explanation isn't entirely accurate. The statement
an adjective ... cannot be the object of a preposition
isn't always true. For example, "this is beyond ridiculous" is a counterexample.

Nonetheless, "for cheap", doesn't make sense, because the specific preposition "for" does not take an adjective.

You can, however, say "for less", because then the sentence would really be saying "for less THAN SOMETHING". In fact, this would be a good marketing gimmick, because you're not actually specifying WHAT it's less than. You might mean "for less than a trip to the moon" or something, but your customers are bound to infer "for less than one expects". (Marketing is one profession in which accurate communication is a positive hinderence, and the real goal is to place a lie in the listener's mind, without actually lying). But you're buying, not selling, so I wouldn't recommend this.

Rommie
Joined on Mon, Jan 26 2004
Earth orbit
Regular Member 606
Chameleon  +  23173 Sun, 22 Feb 04 10:26 PM
Fool that I am... Smile [:)] I should know better that to make absolute statements when talking about language. You are, of course, correct rommie. Now that you point this out, I can think of many instances where an adjective is the object of a preposition...weird.
whl626, 5 yr 277 days ago
eg. This forum is not for the rich. ( rich is also an adjective used as a noun )
rommie  +  23195 Mon, 23 Feb 04 09:16 AM
Yeah, but it's the word "the" that makes the difference there. It's just a kind of shorthand really.

The rich = rich people
The poor = poor people
The intelligent = intelligent people

and so on. So you're right - it's an adjective acting a noun, but it's not an adjective acting as an adjective, and it only works if you include the word "the".

Rommie
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.