[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Feb 9 2007 9:08 AM by If Winter Comes. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
If Winter Comes  +  326731 Fri, 09 Feb 07 08:21 AM

Is the following sentence grammatically correct in the sense of the usage of infinitive "to"

" To see the scene, I was shocked." 

meaning, When I saw the scene, I was shocked.  

I understand, usually in this type of sentence, we are supposed to use gerund ;

"Seeing the scene, I was shocked."

If the sentense above is grammatically correct, is that the same usage as

" To be frank with you, it was my fault."

Please explain out to me.

Big Smile [:D]

Joined on Thu, Jan 4 2007
New Member 10
CalifJim  +  326735 Fri, 09 Feb 07 08:30 AM
You need I was shocked to see the scene.

to see the scene explains why you were shocked so it falls most naturally after shocked.

Compare:

I was happy to see you.
I am glad to be here.
Mary was surprised to see you still awake so late.
We are sad to hear the news.


We can't use the same logic with to be frank.  If we say It was my fault to be frank with you, we're saying that being frank was a fault!  Smile [:)]

Compare:

To be honest, I didn't like the film.

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,463
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
If Winter Comes  +  326740 Fri, 09 Feb 07 08:47 AM

Thank you for your prompt and logical explanation.

"To see the scene, I was convinced that I was wrong."

Can we interpret the sentence above as "inversion" form of

"I was convinced that I was wrong to see the scene" 

to emphasize the pharase "to see the scene"?

CalifJim  +  326744 Fri, 09 Feb 07 09:00 AM
No.  The meaning is different.  This is not mere inversion.

The first sentence will be interpreted as When I saw the scene, I was convinced that I was wrong.  In other words the seeing of the scene caused me to realize that I was wrong.  Note the placement of to see the scene near convinced.

The second sentence will be interpreted as I was convinced that I did something wrong by seeing the scene.  I should not have seen the scene.  Note the placement of to see the scene near wrong.

CJ



If Winter Comes, 2 yr 291 days ago

Thank you again for your rational explanation.

I think I got it right now.

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.