Minhuoc  +  222931 Sat, 06 May 06 07:31 AM "It is unreasonable to regard any language as the possession of a particular nation, and with no language is it more unreasonable than with English." Thanks. Minhuoc Joined on Tue, Oct 18 2005 Full Member 358 Regards

	Mister Micawber  +  222943 Sat, 06 May 06 09:32 AM Sounds OK to me.  What's your question, Minhuoc? Mister Micawber Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004 Yokohama Veteran Member 30,833 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'

	nona the brit  +  222982 Sat, 06 May 06 12:08 PM Tthe language it is most unreasonable to think of as belonging to only one nation, is English. We are unreasonable if we do not think of English as belonging to many nations. nona the brit Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004 England Veteran Member 11,713 The name says it all.

	MrPedantic  +  223039 Sat, 06 May 06 02:24 PM It's an interesting structure. I suppose "with" means "in the case of", in such examples. MrP MrPedantic Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004 Veteran Member 12,592 ...opella forensis / adducit febris...

	Lieutenant  +  223067 Sat, 06 May 06 03:49 PM  Minhuoc wrote: "It is unreasonable to regard any language as the possession of a particular nation, and with no language is it more unreasonable than with English." Thanks. Grammatically flawless........ semantically superb. Lieutenant Joined on Sat, Apr 29 2006 Buenos Aires New Member 09 Everybody makes mistakes... but it seems it's mine that always keep on stinging. Regards