[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Jun 11 2008 6:19 AM by CalifJim. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Carry  +  525595 Tue, 10 Jun 08 11:33 PM
Is it correct to say "It has (got) to be the postman" instead of "It must be the postman" when I'm making a deduction based on hearing someone knock on my front door? Thank you in advance for your answer.
Joined on Sun, Apr 13 2008
Poland
New Member 03
Marius Hancu, 1 yr 168 days ago
 Fine, IMO
CalifJim  +  525700 Wed, 11 Jun 08 06:19 AM
Carry
“Is it correct to say "It has (got) to be the postman" instead of "It must be the postman" when I'm making a deduction based on hearing someone knock on my front door? ”
I think it's more common to use that.  These are all possible.

That's got to be ...

That has to be ...

That must be ...

The first one sounds more informal to me, and also makes the speaker appear very sure of his deduction.

I would guess that the last one is the most often used. 

CJ 

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,463
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.