Hi Nona,
Nona The Brit wrote: |
| team for plural - you may not like it personally but it is accepted as grammatically correct. |
|
Accepted by whom? Can you provide a citation?
A Google search returns: "
team is" 12.4 million; "
team are" 1.2 million; that's more than 10:1 in favour of the singular. Even that is not truely representative since the "
team are" search returns many grammatically correct sentences that do not comply with this context, such as:
Two members of the team are skilled and experienced researchers. Nona The Brit wrote: |
Would you write an advertisement that said
Pensioners! They can get half price hair cuts...
instead of
Pensioners! You can get half price hair cuts ...
|
|
I wouldn't write either. Maybe: "
Pensioners eligible for half price haircuts" (no pronoun needed here and the outcome is a little like a tabloid headline); or "
if you are a pensioner, you are eligible for a half price hair cut" (this makes eligibility conditional to being a pensioner).
Grammar Geek wrote: |
| Bokeh, I don't understand your object to these. Can you try to explain why you think they are wrong again? |
|
Hi GG
Everyone is in agreement over "them" and "its" so there's no point discussing those.
Grammar Geek wrote: |
we do ususally use the singular for words such as "team" in this case, each of the individual members may have a different area of expertise, and I want to hear from all of them.
|
|
"
Team" is clearly singular. If you were to want to use the pronoun "
their" the sentence should be:
Wonderland Park's gardening team members will offer their special growing tips.
As for using the pronoun "
you" the problem is it doesn't have concordance with the antecedent "
Fun Club members". Can you explain how you believe "
Fun Club members" (third person) can take a second person pronoun in the subsequent sentence?