It was to have been John

   Share on Facebook  
Tuongvan  #462502  Thu, 10 Jan 08 05:21 AM

Dear teachers ,

Please help correct my translation  below::

Situation : Last month the company managenent planned to appoint John the marketing manager , but for some reason ,they changed their mind and appointed Alice marketing manager.

So can I say this to Alice ?:

1/ John was to have been appointed marketing manager , not you .

And can I say this to one of my friends ?:

2/ It was to have been John  who was appointed marketing manager , not Alice ,

Please correct me

Thank you in advance  

  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
Regular Member (749)
van
Delmobile  #462508  Thu, 10 Jan 08 05:41 AM
These are both beautiful, maybe a little too much so Smile [:)]

1 is fine.

2 is also correct, but it would be more usual to hear "John was going to be appointed" than "it was to have been John who was appointed." (Or to put it in active voice, "They were going to appoint John." ) "It was to have been John who was..." is a lot of little words to keep straight, even for native speakers.

In fact, you'd probably hear, "John was going to be appointed marketing manager, not you" for number 1, too. Or maybe "They were planning to appoint John."


HTH
  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Jan 2 2008
Mobile, AL, USA
Regular Member (543)
Trusted Users
Tuongvan  #462533  Thu, 10 Jan 08 07:35 AM

Thank you very much DelmobileBig Smile [:D]

  
Anonymous  #462944  Fri, 11 Jan 08 07:33 AM

Hi, Delmobile.

Tuongvan wrote:

So can I say this to Alice ?:

1/ John was to have been appointed marketing manager , not you .

To this, you said 'fine'. Could this be fine too?

John was to be appointed marketing manager, not you.

  
Anonymous  #463085  Fri, 11 Jan 08 04:35 PM
Okay, now I'm in over my head. Both sentences are correct, and either would work in your situation, but obviously there is a very slight difference between "was to have been" and "was to be." (If I knew more about grammar, I could label the tenses with their proper names, but I can't.)

Help!


  
Marius Hancu  #463145  Fri, 11 Jan 08 07:36 PM
Another alternative, but with a less clear sequence of tenses, perhaps:

2/ It was John  who should have been appointed marketing manager , not Alice.



  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Montreal, Canada
Veteran Member (11,673)
Proficient Speaker
MrPedantic  #463176  Fri, 11 Jan 08 10:42 PM
 Tuongvan wrote:

So can I say this to Alice ?:

1/ John was to have been appointed marketing manager , not you .

You can say it to Alice; but Alice might be offended. It sounds very much as if John was your preferred candidate.

If you don't want to offend Alice, but don't want to be entirely untruthful, you can say e.g.

2. At one stage, there was a possibility that John would be appointed as marketing manager. But of course, after we looked at your CV, it was obvious who was the better candidate.

MrP

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Oct 13 2004
Veteran Member (12,142)
Proficient SpeakerSystemAdministrator
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service