Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, May 28 2005 4:34 AM by Vincent Ding. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Vincent Ding  +  103573 Sat, 28 May 05 04:34 AM
I find the two words somewhat difficult to distinguish in such cases as the following:

To reach a peace treaty is the joint/mutual goal of the two nations.
Joined on Fri, Apr 29 2005
Full Member 182
Mister Micawber  +  103598 Sat, 28 May 05 08:15 AM

'Joint' here, I think-- 'joint' means together, and 'mutual means 'to or for each other'. 'Mutual' suggests reciprocality; 'joint' does not.

Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,501
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Vincent Ding  +  103933 Mon, 30 May 05 03:54 AM
Reciprocality for mutual. Hummm....That's a good point. Tks a lot. Further, could you please enlighten me on this one: Through joint/mutual consultation, they reached their joint goal to cease fire.Smile [:)]
Mister Micawber  +  103968 Mon, 30 May 05 08:46 AM

Again, I prefer 'joint'. 'Mutual' seems redundant, as consultation by definition would be between them. On the other hand, 'joint' appears again later in the sentence, making for poor style. I would start again, Vince:

'They reached a ceasefire through joint consultation.'

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.