We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, Apr 19 2005 4:20 AM by jack112. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
jack112  +  91355 Tue, 19 Apr 05 04:20 AM
Are these correct? If not, why? What do they mean?
1. What kind of pants are these?
2. What kind of pants is these?

Joined on Thu, Jul 22 2004
Regular Member 715
nona the brit  +  91380 Tue, 19 Apr 05 07:37 AM
Pants (or trousers to us BrE speakers) are slightly odd in that they are considered plural. I am wearing a pair of trousers. They are black and do not have any pockets.

I don't know why...two legs? But then jumpers (sweaters) have two arms and are not talked about in the plural.

So anyway, 1 is correct.
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member 11,713
The name says it all.
jack112, 4 yr 220 days ago
What about this:

1. What pair of pants is this?
2. What pair of pants are these? (Incorrect?)
abbie1948  +  91434 Tue, 19 Apr 05 12:49 PM
I have been searching for an explanation (the things we do!) The only one I can come up with is that perhaps originally 'pants' comprised 2 separate legs which were tied around the waist. I believe this is the case for the first women's undergarments.
Joined on Thu, Mar 24 2005
England
Senior Member 2,657
Hope that helps. Abbie
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.29165. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.