[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Sep 28 2005 1:50 PM by goldmund. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Kangiten  +  142274 Tue, 27 Sep 05 04:12 PM
Smile [:)]

I read on the forums that less is sometimes used with plural nouns, especially those expressing distances or periods of time. Yet, technically, fewer is to be used in such cases so in the end, what's the correct form (by correct I mean both in terms of grammar and "how a native speaker would say it", if you see what I mean).

"We can perform this task in less than 3 weeks"
"We can perform this task in fewer than 3 weeks"

Someone told me that the problem could be eliminated through the use of "under" i.e.

"We can perform this task in under 3 weeks".

So what's the best way of putting it?





Joined on Tue, Oct 26 2004
Full Member 116
Clive  +  142288 Tue, 27 Sep 05 04:52 PM

Hi,

Swan's Practical English Usage notes that 'in theory' fewer is used with plurals and less with uncountables. Swan goes on to say that in modern English, many people use less instead of fewer, especially in an informal style. Finally, he notes that 'Some people consider this incorrect'.

If I were you, I wouldn't worry about it too much.

Best wishes, Clive

 

 

 

 

 

Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member 29,664
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
Kangiten, 4 yr 60 days ago
Thank you very much Smile [:)]
khoff  +  142305 Tue, 27 Sep 05 05:35 PM
In this particular example -- "less than three weeks" vs. "fewer than three weeks" -- I would almost certainly use "less" because I'm thinking of "three weeks" as a single chunk of time, not as three individual weeks.  In other words, I would take "fewer than three weeks" to mean "two weeks or one week," while "less than three weeks" might mean 12 days, 16 days, 19 days, etc.
Joined on Sun, Mar 6 2005
Senior Member 3,278
Native speaker of American English (but not a grammar expert)
goldmund  +  142603 Wed, 28 Sep 05 01:50 PM

Dear friends,

It is my belief that «less than three weeks» means «less than three» + «weeks».

It is therefore perhaps that «less» qualifies «three», not «weeks». Smile [:)]

Kind regards, Smile [:)]

Goldmund

 

Joined on Fri, Jun 10 2005
Regular Member 581
«Tout homme peut dire véritablement; mais dire ordonnément, prudemment et suffisamment, peu d'hommes le peuvent.» - Michel de Montaigne
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.