We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Sep 14 2007 6:59 PM by Yoong Liat. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
milky  +  418311 Fri, 14 Sep 07 02:43 AM

What's the difference in use between these?

He met the woman he later married,

He met the woman he would later marry.

Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
Goodman  +  418400 Fri, 14 Sep 07 06:35 AM

The bulk meaning is the same. But I prefer the first. He married her later. it's a fact.

The second one " he would later marry" some how drawsa few questions in my mind. 

Joined on Mon, Nov 7 2005
Senior Member 3,816
The name says it all!
Yoong Liat  +  418639 Fri, 14 Sep 07 06:59 PM
 Milky wrote:

What's the difference in use between these?

He met the woman he later married,

He met the woman he would later marry.

The first sentence is straighforward past tense, while the second is "the future in the past".

Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
Veteran Member 6,757
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.