Click here to play!

marriage or marriages

Click here to play
1 2 3 4 5
   Share on Facebook  
CalifJim  #525669  Wed, 11 Jun 08 05:03 AM
Anonymous
Is it right to say that marriages are abstract and uncountable?
No.  The fact that you've used the plural marriages means it's countable.  Any plural form you see indicates that the noun is countable.  Uncountable (or noncountable) nouns do not occur in the plural.

CJ 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (16,572)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Avangi  #526015  Wed, 11 Jun 08 08:42 PM

New2grammar
As far as I know singular and plural are words associated with countable.

Absolutely correct, but that doesn't stop us from saying that we use the singular form when indicating the abstract/concept/generic meanings of nouns.

In the sentence, "He wrote an article about the child in conflict with modern society," "child" is singular.   (I may say this without evoking countable/uncountable.)

  - A.

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Senior Member (3,023)
Proficient SpeakerTrusted Users
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
optilang  #526018  Wed, 11 Jun 08 08:54 PM
 I think

marriage - the condition of a couple legally united

or

marriage - the ceremony by which the condition is created.

Therefore I think,  marriage in the singular when talking about the condition/state  and marriages (if there are more than one) when talking about the ceremony or act of marriage.

 

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Tue, May 13 2008
Poland
Senior Member (2,107)
Proficient Speaker
OptiNative British English Speaker Wherever I may roam, I'm still a Londoner.
Avangi  #526026  Wed, 11 Jun 08 09:06 PM

I agree with those who have said they're comfortable with "marriages" as a "concept/generic term."

  
Goodman  #526078  Wed, 11 Jun 08 11:43 PM

I am still having a difficult time seeing “marriages” as a concept or should I call it a generic term.  To me “gay marriage” is a civil right to some, a controversy to many and a moral issue depending on one’s upbringing. Whichever the case may be, it’s singular in nature even though under this singularity lies many gay marriages. Communism is a concept / an ideology and a way of life and so I see “gay marriage” as a generic term and therefore should be interpreted as singular entity in general referral.  That’s one man’s opinion.

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 7 2005
Calif. USA
Senior Member (3,090)
The name says it all!
Grammar Geek  #526111  Thu, 12 Jun 08 02:35 AM

Would you agree that in the statement "High-heeled shoes may look nice but damage the feet" is a generic statement? It doesn't have to apply to any specific shoes, except those with high heels.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Pennsylvania, USA
Veteran Member (15,294)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
Barbara, who answers in American English.
Goodman  #526170  Thu, 12 Jun 08 06:56 AM
<<>>Would you agree that in the statement "High-heeled shoes may look nice but damage the feet" is a generic statement?

But it's not an apple-to apple comparison.

I would call polygamy and Yoga is a generic term which is a way of life just like gay life style. But I still can't get connected to the “high-heeled shoes concept…..

  
Grammar Geek  #526311  Thu, 12 Jun 08 01:47 PM

See, I disagree.

High-heeled shoes are uncomfortable.

Gay marriages are [fine][disgusting]. (I don't want to get into that debate, obviously.)

In both of these sentences, I'm not talking about specific instances at all. I'm using the term generically, just like "Lions are fierce hunters."

A lion is a fierce hunter. Lions are fierce hunters.
A high-heeled shoe is sexy. High-heeled shoes are sexy.
A gay marriage is a celebration of love. Gay marriages are a celebration of love.

Singular or plural can still be used in a generic sense.

  
Yoong Liat  #526397  Thu, 12 Jun 08 04:04 PM

optilang

Therefore I think,  marriage in the singular when talking about the condition/state  and marriages (if there are more than one) when talking about the ceremony or act of marriage.

 

It should be '... there is more than one...'
  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
Singapore
Veteran Member (5,864)
Yoong Liat
1 2 3 4 5
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions