[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Nov 1 2006 9:54 AM by Tung Quoc. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Tung Quoc  +  288030 Wed, 01 Nov 06 02:14 AM

Please read:

The ownership of UK plc has changed dramatically in the past four decades. In 1963, individuals owned more than 50 per cent of the market and overseas investors held just 7 per cent. By 2004, just over 14 per cent was owned directly by small shareholders, despite the privatisation programme of the Thatcher years and the demutualisation of building societies and insurers. Foreign holdings soared to nearly a third of the whole market, but the biggest chunk is controlled by City money managers.
 

What people do not realise, according to the authors of a new book, is that these institutions are simply holding the assets on behalf of ordinary savers - so millions of people hold tiny stakes in companies through their pension funds and endowment plans.

1/ Do individuals mean Britist companies in general or persons in general?

2/ Do City money managers mean the persons who manage the money of the city or the persons who manage the money of the companies city ? If the latter is right, what companies?

3/ These institutions =building societies + insurers.

in companies = in building societies + in insurers.

Am I right?

4/stakes = interests?

5/ Do their pension funds and endowment plans mean the pension funds and endownment plans of these 2 institutions or of people?

6/ I dont understand so millions of people hold tiny stakes in companies through their pension funds and endowment plans.(1)

I think (1) mean: People send their money in either building societies or insurers and have the ownership of some shares. Building societies or insurers receive their money in exchange for shares of ownership then  these 2 institutions invest these funds in loans secured by first mortages on homes and will have profits. At the end of each period of time, these 2 institutions devide profits to those who own shares.

So, why through their pension funds and endowment plans

but not through profits of these 2 institutions ?Please explain me.

Thanks

Q

Joined on Sun, Sep 17 2006
Regular Member 870
Mister Micawber  +  288108 Wed, 01 Nov 06 07:29 AM

in companies = in UK plc companies as per the thesis sentence (The ownership of UK plc has changed dramatically in the past four decades)

Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,805
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Tung Quoc  +  288150 Wed, 01 Nov 06 09:54 AM

Thanks teacher,

Now if possible, please share with me your opinions about my questions.

1/ Do individuals mean Britist companies in general or persons in general?

2/ Do City money managers mean the persons who manage the money of the city or the persons who manage the money of the companies city ? If the latter is right, what companies?

If neither is correct, what does it mean?

3/ I think:

 these institutions =building societies + insurers.

How about you?

Am I right?

4/stakes = interests?

5/ Do their pension funds and endowment plans mean the pension funds and endownment plans of these 2 institutions or of people?

6/ I dont understand so millions of people hold tiny stakes in companies through their pension funds and endowment plans.(1)

I think (1) mean: People send their money in either building societies or insurers and have the ownership of some shares. Building societies or insurers receive their money in exchange for shares of ownership then  these 2 institutions invest these funds in loans secured by first mortages on homes and will have profits. At the end of each period of time, these 2 institutions devide profits to those who own shares.

So, why through their pension funds and endowment plans

but not through profits of these 2 institutions ?Please explain me.

Thanks

Q

PS: Here is the link: http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1934076,00.html


© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.29165. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.