narrowly avoid

   Share on Facebook  
New2grammar  #511655  Fri, 09 May 08 02:40 PM

While learning the expression "close, but no cigar", I came across this sentence:

It appears in U. S. newspapers widely from around 1949 onwards. For example, a story from The Lima News, Lima, Ohio, November 1949, where The Lima House Cigar and Sporting Goods Store narrowly avoided being burned down in a fire, was titled 'Close But No Cigar'.

 

My question is, did the store burn down? In other words, is narrowly avoided equal to almost failed to avoid but avoided?

Thanks in advance!

  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Nov 21 2006
Advanced Member (2,894)
Mister Micawber  #511662  Fri, 09 May 08 02:53 PM
.
The store did not burn down.   Narrowly avoided = avoided
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Forum Guru (18,257)
SystemAdministratorTeachers
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
.
'A fabis abstineto' - Anon
CalifJim  #511730  Fri, 09 May 08 06:18 PM
 Here's something that may lead you to do further research.

When the owners of the cigar and sporting goods store narrowly avoided being burned down, they avoided the disaster by the skin of their teeth

New2grammar
is narrowly avoided equal to almost failed to avoid but avoided?
Yes.

CJ 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Forum Guru (14,833)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
New2grammar  #511731  Fri, 09 May 08 06:23 PM

Big Smile CJ, by the way, can I replace it with by a nose/hair in this context?

Thanks.

  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: narrowly avoid
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions