Native-speaker intuition.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
   Share on Facebook  
Tam Sadek  #285001  Tue, 24 Oct 06 10:59 AM
I agree with you milky.

To dismiss conversational English purely because it's more complicated to explain is no answer at all!

Most students 'know' that conversational English differs from what they generally learn in the classroom, which is why many students ask specifically for 'conversation' courses.

Unfortunately there aren't any 'conversational' coursebooks that address this problem. Invariably most teachers use 'discussion' activity books to fill the void; a discussion, although it is one form of spoken English, is not a conversation.

A few years ago at a RELC conference held in Singapore , I asked 'grammar guru' Ron Carter the following question in open forum:

"Given what we now know about different registers of English and students' access to so much electronic media, such as English-laqnguage cable TV channels and the Internet; for how much longer do you think that teachers will be able to pretend that the fabricated English used in coursebooks and the classroom is connected in any way to 'real' English?"

He answer was very direct.

"Not long. Teachers will have to radically adapt the way they teach and what they teach, especially when it comes to acceptability - or get out of the classroom!"

You can imagine what a stir this caused amongst teachers that dismissed the 'vernacular' as sub-standard English.

And with regard to LGSWE, EnglishUser, it's actually not merely about conversation, but about different registers of English; it examines usage across four registers - Academic, Fiction, News and Conversation; which is why it's called 'Grammar of WRITTEN and SPOKEN English.

Helping users look at how English Grammar and Usage differs in different registers is very useful when it comes to appropriacy and accuracy.

How that's incorporated into coursebooks and course design is another matter...
  
Top 200 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Oct 4 2006
Full Member (265)
Teachers
The more you see, the less you know...
Tam Sadek  #285003  Tue, 24 Oct 06 11:06 AM
Mmmmm...

Standard grammar? So the past participle of 'get' is 'got' or 'gotten'?

Standard vocabulary? Is that torch or flashlight? Elevator or lift? Flat or apartment?

Standard Pronunciation? So the 'a' in bath, laugh, fast, etc is /ɑː/ or /æ/?

So EnglishUser, exactly what 'standard' should people be learning?
  
nona the brit  #285006  Tue, 24 Oct 06 11:09 AM

English English of course. The original version of the language Big Smile [:D]

...but then we have lots of variation too...different accents and dialects.....different age groups speak differently....etc......etc......etc

It's an impossible question. There will never be one definitive 'English'.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member (11,354)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
The name says it all.
Tam Sadek  #285010  Tue, 24 Oct 06 11:27 AM
I agree Nona,

Even something as simple as a round bread 'thingy' is known as a 'barm cake' in the North-West of England; a 'batch' in the Midlands; and a 'bap' in the South-East.

Personally, if we've got to decide on a standard, then I go with 'barm cake' and think we should ban all the rest! But then again I would, being from the North!
  
Cool Breeze  #285032  Tue, 24 Oct 06 12:58 PM
 Nona The Brit wrote:

English English of course. The original version of the language Big Smile [:D]

...but then we have lots of variation too...different accents and dialects.....different age groups speak differently....etc......etc......etc

It's an impossible question. There will never be one definitive 'English'.


No, never. And the language got a very 'bad' start for that because the Angles, Saxons and Jutes who invaded Britain in the 5th century and brought the language with them from the continent didn't speak exactly the same language. These differences have persisted to this day and today's variations have their roots deep in history. If only one tribe had come from one geographic area, English would in all likelihood be more unified.

However, that could mean the language might not be as interesting and fascinating as it is.

Cheers
CB
  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Helsinki, Finland
Senior Member (2,856)
Proficient SpeakerTrusted Users
The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco.- Mark Twain
milky  #285043  Tue, 24 Oct 06 01:23 PM
 Englishuser wrote:

How about learning basic 'standard grammar', vocabulary and pronunciation?

Englishuser

What is "basic standard grammar"? Does it exclude spoken English?

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member (3,149)
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
milky  #285044  Tue, 24 Oct 06 01:29 PM

<"Not long. Teachers will have to radically adapt the way they teach and what they teach, especially when it comes to acceptability - or get out of the classroom!" >

And I agree with him.

<And with regard to LGSWE, EnglishUser, it's actually not merely about conversation, but about different registers of English; it examines usage across four registers - Academic, Fiction, News and Conversation; which is why it's called 'Grammar of WRITTEN and SPOKEN English. >

Yes, I know. It's the same with the non-student edition. I was surprised recently to find an English language academy here in Spain that is offering spoken grammar and register use as part of the curriculum. I've covered such things in my classes for years, and most times without the approval of EFL bosses and course directors.

  
Englishuser  #285114  Tue, 24 Oct 06 05:28 PM

Hi nona the brit,

You wrote:

English English of course. The original version of the language

English English, as it is spoken today, is no closer to the original version of the language than, say, American English. If you want to speak 'the original English', or a language as close to 'the original English' as possible, you need to speak Old English, and I highly doubt many Brits even understand Old English that well.

Englishuser

  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Mar 30 2006
Regular Member (717)
Englishuser  #285117  Tue, 24 Oct 06 05:31 PM

Hi Tam Sadek,

You wrote:

Most students 'know' that conversational English differs from what they generally learn in the classroom, which is why many students ask specifically for 'conversation' courses.

Does it? I think you can make yourself understood and understand others perfectly well if you speak English as it is described in ESL grammar books. Most people who ask for conversation courses do so because they want to gain fluency in spoken English.

Englishuser

  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL Linguistics Discussion Forum
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service