Nature

1 2 3
   Share on Facebook  
Taka  #268926  Mon, 18 Sep 06 06:28 PM
 Milky wrote:

Just a side note: around.



?? What do you mean??
  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Sep 7 2004
Japan
Senior Member (2,351)
Annvan  #268958  Mon, 18 Sep 06 07:43 PM
Yes, English is my mother tongue. I think "the fixation of time in the natural environment" simply means time, the passing of time. It's 'fixed' (... unless you've learnt to time travel!)
  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
The Philippines
Regular Member (614)
Proficient Speaker
Marius Hancu  #268960  Mon, 18 Sep 06 07:52 PM
I initially read:
fixed in nature=
immutable, of a fixed nature
but I have to recognize, it could well mean
permanent in the nature around us
It's confusing.
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Montreal, Canada
Veteran Member (11,673)
Proficient Speaker
nona the brit  #268967  Mon, 18 Sep 06 08:07 PM
I still read it in the 'fixed in nature=immutable' sense. The other meaning doesn't make sense.
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member (11,450)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
The name says it all.
Taka  #269948  Wed, 20 Sep 06 05:49 PM
 Nona The Brit wrote:
I still read it in the 'fixed in nature=immutable' sense. The other meaning doesn't make sense.


Just out of cuirosity, nona, why do you think the other meaning doesn't make sense?
  
nona the brit  #270058  Wed, 20 Sep 06 09:01 PM

People think that time is fixed in the natural environment? Well, that doesn't make much sense to me.

1. It suggests that people would think that time isn't fixed in other environments.

2. Who thinks that time is fixed in the natural environment anyway? As opposed to what? Not exactly a common belief...I can't even get my head round it.

  
Grammar Geek  #270062  Wed, 20 Sep 06 09:04 PM

It's not that time is fixed, it's that the always-moving-forward, can't-go-back and can't-stand-still ASPECT of time is a "given" in our environment. 

But this is one of the cases when over-analyzing isn't really helping, I think. We all understand the meaning of the sentence, even if we aren't sure what sense of the word he meant.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Pennsylvania, USA
Veteran Member (16,094)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
Barbara, who answers in American English.
Taka  #270194  Thu, 21 Sep 06 03:02 AM
 Nona The Brit wrote:

People think that time is fixed in the natural environment? Well, that doesn't make much sense to me.

1. It suggests that people would think that time isn't fixed in other environments.

Exactly.


 Grammar Geek wrote:

We all understand the meaning of the sentence, even if we aren't sure what sense of the word he meant.



But Annvan, whose first language is English and who is a teacher of English, seems to have a different idea.
  
Grammar Geek  #270199  Thu, 21 Sep 06 03:29 AM

But I think that regardless of which definition of "nature" you pick, the essense of the sentence is people they they just have to accept that [the passing of] time is a factor in our lives that we can't do anything about. Whether it's "fixed in our environment" or "unchanging in its nature," either way, time is something we just have to accept "as-is."

Who else has another interpretation of the the entire sentence?

  
1 2 3
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service