We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This is a discussion thread.
Latest post Sun, Sep 13 2009 5:14 PM by Usenet. 0 replies.
| |
Harold Kupp    900196 Sun, 13 Sep 09 05:14 PM

The King James Bible translation of the second commandment reads:
A. Exo 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
B. Exo 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for
I the LORD
I have a friend who says that the colon is being used in this way:

=95 syntactical-deductive: introduces the logical consequence, or effect, of a fact stated before.
I say that is grammatical nonsense. Exo 20:5 could not be the logical consequence or effect of Exo 20:4.
My questions are:
1. Is Sentence B the logical consequence or effect of Sentence A?
2. How is the colon being used between the two sentences?
Thanks for your help.
Harold
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.