Need help with Wright again

It sounds like you skipped at least one paragraph between your first two paragraphs and the red one.  Give me at least a fighting chance!

Search for the text on the net and provide the links, pls:

http://online.chabotcollege.edu/shildreth/isls/2003program/wrightlinks.html

or better:

http://www.archive.org/stream/franklloydwright010191mbp/franklloydwright010191mbp_djvu.txtl

V. Bring out the nature of the materials, let their nature intimately into your scheme. 
Strip the wood of varnish and let it alone; stain it. Develop the natural texture of the 
plastering and stain it. Reveal the nature of the wood, plaster, brick or stone in your designs; 
they are all by nature friendly and beautiful. No architectural treatment can be really a 
matter of fine art when these truly natural characteristics are, or their essential nature is, 
outraged or neglected. 

VI. A house that has character stands a good chance of growing more valuable as it grows 
older while a house in the prevailing mode, whatever that mode may be, is soon out of 
fashion, stale, and unprofitable. 

Buildings like people must first be sincere, must be true and then withal as gracious and 
lovable as may be. 

Above all, integrity. The machine is the normal tool of our civilization; give it work that 
it can do well; nothing is of greater importance. To do this will be to formulate new indus- 
trial ideals, sadly needed. 

These propositions are chiefly interesting because for some strange reason they were novel 
when formulated in the face of conditions hostile to them and because the ideals they 
phrase have been practically embodied in the buildings that were built to live up to them. 
The buildings of recent years have not only been true to them, but are in many cases a 
further development of the simple propositions so positively stated then. 

Sorry, Cadzao.  It certainly is baffling.  The first two paragraphs connect to each other, but the red one is definitely off the wall. It needs some kind of transition, or introduction.  Even if he's attempting to draw some kind of parallel between houses and machines, you can't begin a new paragraph and a new idea with, "Above all, integrity."  It would certainly make a good motto, perhaps in German.

Are you sure this isn't a collage of random quotes?

Good luck,  - A.

Edit.  If you look at the quote Marius posted, you'll notice that it flows freely between the remarks of a commentator and the remarks supposedly of Wright, with no attempt to mark which is which.  If this is, as you say, an article by Wright, what are the words of this other guy doing in here??