Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Nov 24 2007 1:17 AM by Grammar Geek. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Teo  +  445644 Sat, 24 Nov 07 12:57 AM

The following sentence is quoted from The Practice of English language Teaching (First published 1991, written by Jeremy Harmer)

We do not only have to show students what language means, we also have to show them how it is used.

I think do should be deleted from the above sentence. Am I right?

Teo
Joined on Tue, Sep 28 2004
Taiwan
Contributing Member 1,631
Thank you very much for your reply.
Grammar Geek  +  445651 Sat, 24 Nov 07 01:17 AM

I would, yes.

You use "do" when you want to be emphatic. You DO have to show students what language means; you DO have to show them how it's used. So although it's not wrong, it gets awkward (in my opinion) with the "not only."

Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member 19,506
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.