Forums · General English Grammar & Vocabulary, Listening & Speaking · General English Grammar Questions
I have yet to find a satisfactory explanation for the plural and negation agreement. Should on say "I have no objections" or I have no objection". Or "I have no remorses" vs "I have no remorse"
Anyone can shed some light on this issue?
Thanks a thousand times
I have no remorse.
objection is countable. One may have more than one objection. So either the singular or the plural is possible.
I have no objection.
I have no objections.
To my ear, the singular sounds better in these cases, at least when the sentences are not placed in context. Context may generate a tendency to use the singular in some cases, the plural in others.
-- Where are those pens I gave you yesterday. I need them.
-- What pens are you talking about? I have no pens./ I don't have any pens.
-- What did you do with that pen I lent you. Can you return it soon?
-- Are you confusing me with someone else? You gave me no pen. / You didn't give me any pen.
Anonymous:Ok, that's a good start CJ. However, is the countable rule the unique way to tackle this problem?
Perhaps a slightly different way to look at it is that speaking of 'no objections' acknowledges that there may/may have been the possibility of multiple objections.
Best wishes, Clive
is the countable rule the unique way to tackle this problem?I doubt it. If so, it would be surprising. There are, more often than not, multiple ways of approaching such situations. Do you have another approach that you prefer? What is the general shape of the "solution" to the problem that you envision? Are you looking for a never-fail rule of some kind, for example?
What's the general shape mean here?
People are waiting to help.
Live chatRegistered users can join here
Related forum topics:
"have a cold" *-)?"have been of"?Was vs. Is?"have completed" v "had..."Have you" vs "Did you"?difference between "having been made"..."Have finished" or "have the...non-subjective "have to".?Difference between "are" and..."Have yet" or "Have not yet"?"have to" as a phrasal verb relating...Which one is correct - "have been..."will have V3" as "must have..."have + object + to + verb"?"Have you any.... ?" and the like?is vs are ?Plz guide me how to use "have, has, had,..."will have pp" does this make sense?"to have been"...?