We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Answered
1 verified answer
Latest post Tue, Aug 11 2009 6:03 PM by Mr Wordy. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Volcano1985  +  857327 Tue, 11 Aug 09 05:05 PM
You can not have robbed him of what he never had, nor of what he had any good reason to believe he ever would have.


Could you please explain of what in this sentence?

Best answer by Mr Wordy  +  857386 Tue, 11 Aug 09 06:03 PM
Volcano1985
I mean why "of + those things", why not only "those things" or only "which"

 

 

Sorry, I misunderstood.

 

You can't "rob someone something".

 

"It robbed him his childhood." -- Wrong

"It robbed him of his childhood." -- OK

All the other replies..
Mr Wordy  +  857331 Tue, 11 Aug 09 05:12 PM
"of what" = "of those things"
Joined on Tue, May 27 2008
Senior Member 2,359
Native British English speaker
Volcano1985  +  857364 Tue, 11 Aug 09 05:36 PM
Why not You can not have robbed him those things he never had, nor those things he had any good reason to believe he ever would have then?
Mr Wordy  +  857366 Tue, 11 Aug 09 05:44 PM
You can not have robbed him of those things he never had, nor of those things he had any good reason to believe he ever would have.

 

Why not this? Well, you'd have to ask the author that. "what" is more concise, I guess.

 

Keep in mind that there are often different but equally acceptable ways of saying the same thing.

Volcano1985  +  857370 Tue, 11 Aug 09 05:47 PM
I mean why "of + those things", why not only "those things" or only "which"
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.