Origin of definiteness

Hi,

As you know from our previous discussions, article usage is often difficult to explain, as well as difficult to learn. Sometimes. more then one choice is possible. It often depends on how the speaker is thinking about his topic.

I was looking at the Collins Cobuild Advanced Learner's English Dictionary for the two words 'television' and 'temperature'. My understanding is that a typical dictionary definition would mostly like be written in the pattern of 'a something is a something' or 'the something is the something'. Of course, there will be some exceptions.

At the said dictionary, a definition given among many listed is "Television is the system of sending picutres and sounds by electrical signals over a distance so that people can receive them on a television in their home." 

My question is "Why does it have to be 'the system' and not 'a system'? I think both can work in this situation. Yes. 'The' suggests to me that the speaker is thinking that television is the only system that can do that. perhapstodauy, in the age of the internet, it might be better to say 'a'?

Also, at the same dictionary, a definition among some others listed is "The temperature of something is a measure of how hot or cold it is." -- Here, my contention is that 'the measure' in addition to 'a measure' can work without making any substantial difference. Does it have to be 'a measure'? I would happily also accept 'the'. However, once again, 'a' suggests to me that the speaker may be thinking that there can be another system for determining hotnesss and coldness.

Let me ask you this, if I may. Do you feel that you are able as yet to write a page of 'ordinary' English without making any mistakes related to articles?

My feeling is that sometimes you just have to jump into the water and start swimming.

Best wishes, Clive

Hi,

OK.The only advice I can offer is simply to read, and to write, a lot. I'm sure you are already doing these things.

Don't hesitate to post any more questions you may have.

Clive

Thank you, Clive.

I found my writing left much to be desired and I made some effort to self-correct. I still don't know how to cut and paste, so I am going to rewrite the whole thing.

 Thank you, Clive. I am not trying to circumvent (this word doesn't seem to fit in this context so I will replace it with 'go around answering') your question, but let me put my answer to your question (should be better to write 'let me answer like this' -- more direct) like this: as you said,  according to how I interpreted (understood or see can work too) it, article usage usually are (should be is) influenced by how a person is thinking at the time of his writing. Many readers might disagree with his uses (or usage or use is better since I am using it generally and not about any specific uses) of articles, but to me, that doesn't make his usage of the articles he used less valid. I think Mr M said long ago (a long time ago might be good too) that something to the effect that in order for effective communication to occur, there has (should be have) to be an understanding and agreement (might be better to switch places like 'agreement and an understanding')on a writer's article uses (might be better to write 'usage of articles') in a writing. To me, that means it is best to have agreement on uses but not having agreement doesn't make his writing any less of a writing (seems grammatically wrong: should be 'any less acceptable') -- it is still a writing (very wrong -- should be 'a piece of writing') to be read, eventhough it might be a less effective one. Right now, I am trying to write more and in furtherance of that (or that effort), I am posting some writings (wrong again, should be "some writing') in this forum to get some help. In addition, I am searching (should add 'for') free online help sites for writing better (awkward -- better if written 'that will help me write better') to get more information. Do you have any advice for me? I am trying to dive in and learn by doing. I presume what you mean (OKbut it is better to use  'meant' since your writing was done in the past) by 'ordinary' English is English for common or ordinary (very awkward -- should be replaced with the phrase in the quotation marks 'common everyday') writing, not for formal, reseach-type writing.

That was hard work. Did I do a fine job -- always appreciate your help?   

T