[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Dec 21 2005 8:15 AM by Anonymous. 11 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
steves5a  +  118476 Fri, 15 Jul 05 05:28 AM

Would there be anyone that would be able to explain Parallel parts and give an example . I have never heard of this before.

 

Thanks in advance.

Joined on Thu, Jun 23 2005
St Petersburg FL
New Member 33
Steven
yulysess  +  118583 Fri, 15 Jul 05 02:27 PM

Hi steves5a,

If you mean “Parallel Structures” by “Parallel parts”, I can explain them  as in the below;

Some conjunctions combine with other words to form what are called correlative conjunctions. These are

both . . . and
not only . . . but also
not . . . but
either . . . or

neither . . . nor
whether . . . or
as . . . as

They always travel in pairs, joining various sentence elements that should be treated as grammatically equal.

-She led the team not only in statistics but also by virtue of her enthusiasm.

-Polonius said, "Neither a borrower nor a lender be."

-Whether you win this race or lose it doesn't matter as long as you do your best

Correlative expressions should be followed by the same grammatical construction. Many violations of this rule can be corrected by rearranging the sentence.

-It was both a long ceremony and very tedious. F

The ceremony was both long and tedious. T

-A time not for words, but action F

A time not for words, but for action T

 

-Either you must grant his request or incur his ill will. F

 

You must either grant his request or incur his ill will.  T

 

My objections are, first, the injustice of the measure; second, that it is unconstitutional. F

 

My objections are, first, that the measure is unjust; second, that it is unconstitutional. T

 

Hope this helps

 

Joined on Fri, Jun 3 2005
Full Member 173
Practise what you preach
steves5a  +  118677 Sat, 16 Jul 05 05:20 AM

This is the question that I have that states Paralle Parts- which one would follow this rule ?

A. In the business world, you must write clearly and with conciseness.

B. I would rather drive a car than ride a bike.

C. Joan is a member of the internal audit committee, a team learder, and plays on the company softball team.

D. The seminar speaker's talked was motivating and challenged.

Theses are the choices to choose from. I would not ask for the answer, but I am having a hard time with this part.

CalifJim  +  118687 Sat, 16 Jul 05 07:18 AM
To solve these puzzles, you have to more or less pull the sentences apart and see if the parts are similar or different.

A.  ... you must write / clearly / and / with conciseness /.

Compare with /clearly/ and /concisely/.
Compare with /with clarity/ and /with conciseness/.

B.  ... rather /drive a car/ than /ride a bike/

Compare with /drive a car/  with /have fun riding a bike/.

C.  /member of .../  /... leader/  /plays on team/  (All three totally different structures.)

D. The talk was /motivating/ and /challenged/

Compare with /motivating/ and /challenging/.

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,463
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Anonymous, 4 yr 134 days ago

D. The seminar speaker's talked was motivating and challenged.

Are you sure you copied the above sentence correctly?

paco2004  +  118887 Sat, 16 Jul 05 09:53 PM

Sure it should be "The seminar speaker's talk was motivating and challenged."

By the way I feel structural parallelism is not a matter of grammar but the matter of style. I remember I was pointed out by Khoff that a sentence like "I'm a Japanese student and learning English in the university extension" sounds natural to native speakers despite the fact that the sentence is against the structural parallelism.

paco

Joined on Wed, Nov 17 2004
Senior Member 4,095
In Japan today even dogs are learning how to bow-wow in English.
davkett  +  118890 Sat, 16 Jul 05 10:03 PM
I agree with Paco.  Only one is parallel structure, and only one is ungrammatical (even after the typo is cleaned up).
Joined on Tue, Jun 7 2005
Pennsylvania, USA
Senior Member 2,788
"The rose stays fresh in its name..." -Bernard of Morlay
paco2004  +  118896 Sat, 16 Jul 05 10:27 PM

I found in another English learners' site a post like below. The original sentence was "The seminar speaker's talk was motivating and challenged us". This sentence is not in a parallel construct, but I don't think it is ungrammatical.  What is your opinion? 

Which sentence contains parallel parts? a) In the business world, you must write clearly and with conciseness. b) I would rather drive a car than ride a bike to work. c) Joan is a member of the internal audit committee, a team ;eader, and plays on the company softball team. d) The seminar speaker's talk was motivating and challenged us. My answer d) ?

paco

CalifJim  +  118979 Sun, 17 Jul 05 06:04 AM
They are all grammatical.  B contains the parallelism: 'drive a car' / 'ride a bike'.

CJ

1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.