[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Jan 31 2008 3:29 PM by Marius Hancu. 7 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Sleepdprived  +  470809 Thu, 31 Jan 08 12:29 AM
Hello all.  I'm a master's student and have been given the task of reviewing one of my advisor's papers.  However, she uses one phrase (for lack of a better term) throughout the entire work that I'm not sure is completely correct.

Here are two sample sentences:
"Individuals draw on knowledge of their surroundings to anticipate their partner’s response."
"Avoidance occurs when individuals strategically refrain from broaching an issue with their partner."

Is this correct?  I've always been a bit obsessive with parallel structure, but I tend to think that the correct phrasing would be "their partners' responses" or "their partners" (under the assumption that multiple individuals have multiple partners who have multiple respnses).

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!  I'd hate to correct my advisor incorrectly!



(PS - Sorry mods; I originally posted anonymously and with an unhelpful title!)
Joined on Thu, Jan 31 2008
New Member 01
Grammar Geek  +  470825 Thu, 31 Jan 08 01:15 AM

Hi, and welcome to the forums.

Recognize that the singular their is well established as an alternative to 'his/her.' If you want to make them parallel, make individuals singular, so it doesn't look like people have multiple partners. Whether their as a singular pronouns is appropriate for an academic paper is another matter.

Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member 19,683
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
Mkyol  +  470853 Thu, 31 Jan 08 02:17 AM

I'd like to follow up with this question, because I've been wondering about this since the beginning of time it seems like.

Please answer and verify my claims below. 

avoidance occurs when individuals strategically refrain from broaching an issue with their partner.
: individuals is plural, their is singular (assume), is this acceptable? The subject of the sentence is plural, and yet the part of the sentence is not directing referring to that (plural version), but rather a singular version by the use of their as singular.
: if plural their is used, then it would mean the entire group of individuals only has one partner, would is a bit of nonsense

avoidance occurs when an individual strategically refrains from broaching an issue with their partners.
: this would almost undoubtably mean an individual has multiple partners, rather than 'their' being used as plural, to indicate one partner for each individual.

avoidance occurs when individuals strategically refrain from broaching an issue with their partners.
: the intended their is plural, but since it can also be singular, it may look like an individual has multiple partners (given that 'the above' is verified to be acceptable)
: if the intended meaning of plural their is used, then it would mean one partner for each individual, or one-to-one relationship

Individuals draw on knowledge of their surroundings to anticipate their partner’s response.
: in 'their surroundings', their would more likely be used as singular, since surrounding is often used in plural form. If their is assumed to be plural, then it would imply, by the usual construction of English, that there is a surrounding for each individual, but as mentioned, surrounding is often used in the plural.

Help is always appreciated.

Joined on Tue, Dec 18 2007
South Korea
Full Member 155
Marius Hancu  +  470967 Thu, 31 Jan 08 10:07 AM
avoidance occurs when an individual strategically refrains from broaching an issue with their partners.

: this would almost undoubtably mean an individual has multiple partners, rather than 'their' being used as plural, to indicate one partner for each individual.

No, it means one or more partners.
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Veteran Member 11,673
Anonymous, 1 yr 300 days ago

Ok, thanks for that Marius.

I'm still wondering about the other points. Someone please enlighten me, thanks.

Grammar Geek  +  471034 Thu, 31 Jan 08 01:41 PM

avoidance occurs when individuals strategically refrain from broaching an issue with their partner.
: individuals is plural, their is singular (assume), is this acceptable?  I find this accepable. But I prefer "an individual... their partner" to be clear about the 1:1 relationship.

The subject of the sentence is plural, and yet the part of the sentence is not directing referring to that (plural version), but rather a singular version by the use of their as singular.
: if plural their is used, then it would mean the entire group of individuals only has one partner, would is a bit of nonsense And the fact that the reader knows that not every individual shares the same partner helps make this sentence work.

avoidance occurs when an individual strategically refrains from broaching an issue with their partners.
: this would almost undoubtably mean an individual has multiple partners, rather than 'their' being used as plural, to indicate one partner for each individual.

I hate to disagree with MH, but when I see "an indivdiual" and "partners" I assume it means each individual has more than one partner. If it meant only one, then it would say "partner." If the writer wanted to show the possibility for one or more than one, then he or she can use "partner(s)."

avoidance occurs when individuals strategically refrain from broaching an issue with their partners.
: the intended their is plural, but since it can also be singular, it may look like an individual has multiple partners (given that 'the above' is verified to be acceptable)
: if the intended meaning of plural their is used, then it would mean one partner for each individual, or one-to-one relationship This version is ambiguous. I could mean each individual has one, or has many.

Individuals draw on knowledge of their surroundings to anticipate their partner’s response.
: in 'their surroundings', their would more likely be used as singular, since surrounding is often used in plural form. If their is assumed to be plural, then it would imply, by the usual construction of English, that there is a surrounding for each individual, but as mentioned, surrounding is often used in the plural. As a noun, I think "surroundings" is always plural.

Mkyol, 1 yr 299 days ago

Thanks very much Grammar Geek, that really helped.

Marius Hancu  +  471078 Thu, 31 Jan 08 03:29 PM
GG said:

>If the writer wanted to show the possibility for one
or more than one, then he or she can use "partner(s).

Only if this is very strict writing. Many people do not care about inserting the
(s), but mean it.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.