Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, May 18 2008 7:43 PM by Cool Breeze. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
New2grammar  +  515259 Sun, 18 May 08 06:14 PM

I feel sometimes a past participle delivers a different meaning depending on whether it's put before or after a noun. For example

I saw a closed door

I saw a door closed.

I saw a smashed potato

I saw a potato smashed.

The first of each example is stative to me, whereas, the second is passive (the act is occuring)

I believe some past particples don't have the passive meaning even though they placed after a noun.

look at the house buried in the landslide

Confusion: Does the verb contribute to the change in meaning?

Please help.

Thanks!

Joined on Tue, Nov 21 2006
Veteran Member 7,676
Who wants to go sailing around the world with me?
Cool Breeze  +  515282 Sun, 18 May 08 07:43 PM
 Hi N2G

You are asking good questions. English is a language of fixed phrases and meanings do change from verb to verb. What's more, some collocations don't have the same meaning even for native  speakers.

CB 

Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member 3,926
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.