In the first paragraph of his famous novel, Tim O'Brien writes:
Billy Boy Watkins was dead, and so was Frenchie Tucker. Billy Boy had died of fright....
Since the event described in the second sentence happened earlier in time than the event in the first sentence, past perfect seems the obvious choice.
I was wondering if it was possible to use "died" (past simple) in the second sentence:
Billy Boy Watkins was dead, and so was Frenchie Tucker. Billy Boy died of fright....
Why? Since in order to be dead, one has to die first. Therefore, the proper sequence of events is still obvious:
1) he died of fright
2) then he was dead
Is the above assumption correct? If so, which of these two versions is the better choice? If not, why not?