[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, Jan 6 2009 12:52 PM by Avangi. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  632320 Tue, 06 Jan 09 09:55 AM
HI. Do we usually (perhaps, always?) use past and present participles (if they are that) in subordinate clauses? Also, is the underlined part a past participle? 

Determined to succeed, she enrolled in a college nearby.
This is a live chat room, hosted on the chat page. You can also click here to see the chat in fullscreen.
Cool Breeze  +  632464 Tue, 06 Jan 09 12:44 PM

No, particples are used in all kinds of clauses. These are examples of main clauses:

I am reading now.

He has written a letter.

Determined is a past participle in your sentence.

CB

Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member 3,979
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
Mister Micawber  +  632473 Tue, 06 Jan 09 12:49 PM
.
If they are used alone as non-finite verbs (as in your example), they are always in dependent (non-finite) clauses.  They are also in heavy use as adjectives (a determined effort) and in main and subordinate clauses incorporating verbs in progressive (is determining) and perfect (had determined) aspects.
.
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,841
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Avangi  +  632475 Tue, 06 Jan 09 12:52 PM
I wouldn't say so.  They are often objects in main clauses, "She tried taking the detour,"  and complements to verbs of being,  "The response was alarming,"   "The car is completely destroyed."  (You may always debate whether this is simply passive voice.)

Yes, "determined" is a PP in your sentence.  As far as I'm concerned, a PP is always a PP, except when it's simple past tense, and in that case it never was a PP.  That is, when it's used as an element in forming another tense, It may still be referred to as the PP.  When it's used as an adjective, it may still be referred to as the PP.  Edit.  PP = past participle, in this paragraph.

The Present participal, on the other hand, may no longer be referred to as the present participle when it functions as a noun.
Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member 8,211
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.