[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Jul 3 2009 11:52 PM by Anonymous. 12 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  800529 Mon, 29 Jun 09 09:58 AM
I understand that for the past 100 years or so most traditional grammar books have defined the English past tense in this way:

 

the past tense expresses or indicates a time that is in the past.

 

What damage do you think such explanations of the past tense have done to ESL students learning?

Kooyeen  +  801235 Tue, 30 Jun 09 01:31 AM
Anonymous
“What damage do you think such explanations of the past tense have done to ESL students learning?”


Negligible damage, I think. That statement alone is not sufficient to influence learners in general, taken out of context. To have an effect, learners would have had to take that short sentence literally, understand its meaning exactly, generalize it to every context, remember it, and then not let anything or anyone else affect their cognition with respect to that "rule".

Not likely, so negligible damage. If you think otherwise, prove it.

Joined on Thu, Dec 22 2005
Italy
Senior Member 4,978
Parental Advisory / Explicit Posts
Anonymous, 147 days ago

Not likely, so negligible damage. If you think otherwise, prove it.

 

Well I wasn't thinking of going to court over this. It's just a question coming from years of working in ESL and hearing students ask why some past tense use does not refer to the past. I often get intermediate students asking that.

MrPedantic  +  801585 Tue, 30 Jun 09 09:51 PM
You merely need to explain that earlier indicative and subjunctive forms were superseded by the modern past tense forms. It should take 30 seconds or so.

 

(The apparent anomaly is not unique to English, by the way. For instance, French students already use the imperfect in the if-clause of their first language "second" conditionals.)

 

MrP

 

 

 

 

Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 12,592
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
Anonymous, 147 days ago
<You merely need to explain that earlier indicative and subjunctive forms were superseded by the modern past tense forms. >

 

Using those words?

MrPedantic  +  801607 Tue, 30 Jun 09 11:00 PM
If you wish. You might add that the precise "time" of the verb is often determined by the drift and nature of the sentence, rather than the verbal form itself.

 

MrP

Anonymous, 147 days ago
MrPedantic
“If you wish. You might add that the precise "time" of the verb is often determined by the drift and nature of the sentence, rather than the verbal form itself.

 

 

MrP

 

From which language level up would I be able to relay such information using such words?

MrPedantic  +  802350 Wed, 01 Jul 09 10:05 PM
Anonymous

From which language level up would I be able to relay such information using such words?

 

 

You would use your students' native language, of course.

 

MrP

 

Anonymous, 146 days ago
You would use your students' native language, of course.

 

Me? Or do you mean "one"?

1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.39139. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.