[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Aug 19 2006 2:20 PM by Inchoateknowledge. 12 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Inchoateknowledge  +  257068 Fri, 18 Aug 06 09:02 AM
Am I right in thinking that words that synactically linked somehow form a phrase.
He was dead, which suprised me.
Is this statement correct factually:
'dead, which' in the above sentence is a group of words, but not a phrase, because syntactically they are not related?

Is it true that all clauses and sentences are phrases?

He opened my suitcase.
Is it also a phrase?
If so, how can I decide without relying on my subjective common sense, but on an objective rule, what the head is, that is, what phrase it is: noun, adjectival, verb, etc.?
I think the head is suitcase, but why?
I just feel it but I do not know it.
thanks


Joined on Wed, May 3 2006
Senior Member 2,549
Beep! Beep! :)
Inchoateknowledge  +  257070 Fri, 18 Aug 06 09:14 AM
I mean this:
Look at the diagram.
that lovely old pub by the bridge over the river
'by the' is not a phrase because there is no direct connection between them


Inchoateknowledge, 3 yr 100 days ago
anybody?

CalifJim  +  257204 Fri, 18 Aug 06 08:15 PM
Nobody wants to touch this one!  It's too hard!
I just feel it but I do not know it.

Same with everyone else, I'm afraid.  Many of these things are based on pure intuition.  Smile [:)]

What you call a phrase is usually called a constituent in transformational grammar.  I think a whole sentence may also be called a constituent, but only in a rather vacuous way.

And certainly word groups like "dead, which" are not constituents.

Another factor which makes such discussions difficult is that the terminology from traditional grammar and the terminology from transformational grammar, more used in linguistics, is not always exactly the same.  In transformational grammar, a single word can be a phrase, for example.  This is not the meaning of 'phrase' in traditional grammar.

CJ


Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,463
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Alienvoord  +  257206 Fri, 18 Aug 06 08:28 PM
Traditionally you are supposed to be able to replace a phrase with a single word. This method can be useful.

He opened my suitcase.
He opened it.

"my suitcase" is a noun phrase, with the noun "suitcase" as the head.

that lovely old pub by the bridge over the river
that lovely old pub there

"by the bridge over the river"is an preposition phrase with the preposition "by" as its head.

So "by the" is not a phrase because you cannot replace it with one word.
Joined on Tue, Jul 25 2006
Toronto
Full Member 345
Anonymous, 3 yr 100 days ago
Hello Alienvoord

Thanks

"Traditionally you are supposed to be able to replace a phrase with a single word"

He opened my suitcase. This is not a phrase then. And therefore, not all sentences are phrases. Quite the opposite, sentences are not phrases. ( I can not imagine how I could replace a noun and a verb with one word)

And how can I identify the head?
"that lovely old pub by the bridge over the river"
Can I simply replace it with the word: that?
That refers to the bridge, so bridge is the head, therefore we have a noun phrase.

in love with the dj
where? Can I say?
'in'. So it is a PP.
I think I get it now.
Thanks again

Inchoateknowledge  +  257312 Sat, 19 Aug 06 07:57 AM
Hello Alienvoord

Thanks
"Traditionally you are supposed to be able to replace a phrase with a single word. This method can be useful." Very
So it means a sentence is not a phrase (can you substitute a verb and a noun with one word -- I cannot)

'that lovely old pub by the bridge over the river'
I can replace it with that.
That refers to the bridge, so bridge is the head and this is a NP.
I seeeeee
Thanks

in love with the dj
where? in -- PP.


Inchoateknowledge  +  257324 Sat, 19 Aug 06 10:35 AM
As is a conjunction and is followed by a verb phrase:

They get up early every morning, as I do.
I do is a verb phrase.
why?


Inchoateknowledge  +  257331 Sat, 19 Aug 06 10:57 AM
 CalifJim wrote:
Nobody wants to touch this one!  It's too hard!
I just feel it but I do not know it.

Same with everyone else, I'm afraid.  Many of these things are based on pure intuition.  Smile [:)]

What you call a phrase is usually called a constituent in transformational grammar.  I think a whole sentence may also be called a constituent, but only in a rather vacuous way.

And certainly word groups like "dead, which" are not constituents.

Another factor which makes such discussions difficult is that the terminology from traditional grammar and the terminology from transformational grammar, more used in linguistics, is not always exactly the same.  In transformational grammar, a single word can be a phrase, for example.  This is not the meaning of 'phrase' in traditional grammar.

CJ




Hello CJ


Sorry, your post I have just realized. Which grammar should I keep to do you think? traditional or transformational?
This distinction is killing me. 
I have come across a sentence analysys in my grammar book.
"They get up early every morning, as I do."
'I do', they say, is a verb phrase.
Why?





1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.