Does this help at all?--
With reference to your letter of ljui/98775/05, dated 23 August 2005, concerning the improper operation of the water scrubber system, we would like to report that the secondary filter has been replaced and fixed properly, and we enclose herewith a copy of WFU's letter regarding the tenant's improper operation of the system. In the meantime, the system has been thoroughly clean since 1 September 2005, according to the contract requirement shown in the attached photos. The result of our recent site inspection indicates the system is operating in normal condition, and that all filters are fixed properly.
Hence, the routine inspection and filter cleansing will be augmented in order to alleviate the unexpected damage. Please be informed that no primary filters or removable parts of the system should be dismantled without authorization. We reserve the right to claim any reimbursement costs incurred due to improper operation of the system.
Questions (blue areas):
1) Has the secondary filter been fixed then put back in place, or has it been replaced with a new one, which has caused the system to be fixed?
2) What is it that is being shown in the photos--the contract requirement or views of the fixed system?
3) I don't understand the 'hence, the inspection and cleansing will be augmented...'