[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Answered (Not Verified)
Latest post Sat, Sep 3 2005 4:25 PM by davkett. 8 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Ben9108  +  132840 Thu, 01 Sep 05 01:39 PM

With reference to letter of ljui/98775/05 dated 23August 2005 concerning the improper operation of water scrubber system. We
would like to report that the secondary filter has been replaced and fixed properly and enclose herewith a copy of WFU's letter regarding the tenant improper operation of the system. On the other hand, the system has been clean thoughtfully by 1 Sept 2005 according to contract requirement which is shown on the attached photos. After our recent site inspection, we found that the system operate in normal condition. It also was reflected that all filters are fixed properly.
Hence, the routine inspection and filter cleansing will be augmented in order to alleviate the unexpected damage. Please be informed that no primary filters or removable parts of the system should be dismantled without authorization. In addition, we reserve the right to claim any reimbursement cost incurred due to improper operation of the system.

 

Please comment and make necessary amendment for the letter. Thanks

Joined on Mon, Aug 29 2005
Full Member 242
Ben9108, 4 yr 86 days ago
Please help me to check the tense of letter.
Ben9108, 4 yr 86 days ago

Is the letter fully correct?

davkett  +  132981 Thu, 01 Sep 05 11:05 PM

Does this help at all?--

With reference to your letter of ljui/98775/05, dated 23 August 2005, concerning the improper operation of the water scrubber system, we would like to report that the secondary filter has been replaced and fixed properly, and we enclose herewith a copy of WFU's letter regarding the tenant's improper operation of the system. In the meantime, the system has been thoroughly clean since 1 September 2005, according to the contract requirement shown in the attached photosThe result of our recent site inspection indicates the system is operating in normal condition, and that all filters are fixed properly.
Hence, the routine inspection and filter cleansing will be augmented in order to alleviate the unexpected damage. Please be informed that no primary filters or removable parts of the system should be dismantled without authorization. We reserve the right to claim any reimbursement costs incurred due to improper operation of the system.

Questions (blue areas): 

1) Has the secondary filter been fixed then put back in place, or has it been replaced with a new one, which has caused the system to be fixed?

2) What is it that is being shown in the photos--the contract requirement or views of the fixed system?

3) I don't understand the 'hence, the inspection and cleansing will be augmented...'

 

Joined on Tue, Jun 7 2005
Pennsylvania, USA
Senior Member 2,788
"The rose stays fresh in its name..." -Bernard of Morlay
Ben9108  +  133080 Fri, 02 Sep 05 06:26 AM

Thanks

Answer the Questions

1) The secondary filter has been replaced with a new one and the filter has been fixed properly in the system.

2) The system has been thoroughly clean since 1 Sept 2005 shown in the attached photos.

3) The routine inspection and filter cleaning will be augmented because of the tenant's improper operation of the system...

    (Increase the inspection and cleaning times than normal)

 

 

davkett  +  133173 Fri, 02 Sep 05 12:55 PM

Thanks, Ben, for the three answers, because some of my wording will need to be changed.  This is just a quick note, because I will be leaving my computer now, until later in the day.  I'll get back to you then.

 

davkett  +  133301 Fri, 02 Sep 05 11:57 PM

With reference to your letter of ljui/98775/05, dated August 23, 2005, concerning the improper operation of the water scrubber system, we would like to report that the secondary filter has been replaced and fitted properly into the system.  We enclose herewith a copy of WFU's letter regarding the tenant's improper operation of the system. We can also assure you that the system has been thoroughly clean since September 1, 2005, (see attached photos), in accordance with the contract requirement. The result of our recent site inspection indicates that all filters are properly fixed and the system is operating normally.
By increasing the frequency of inspections and filter cleansing we will be minimizing the threat of future damage. Please be informed that no primary filters or removable parts of the system should be dismantled without authorization. We reserve the right to claim reimbursement for any costs incurred due to improper operation of the system.

 

Let me know if this now sounds right to you, since there was still a bit of guesswork on my part as to what the entire circumstances are that have caused you to write this letter.

 

Ben9108  +  133498 Sat, 03 Sep 05 04:13 PM

Thank You So Much davkett

The letter reply to my company's client concerning the tenant's improper operation the system leading to some damage.

 

davkett, 4 yr 84 days ago

You're welcome, Ben.  I hope it works out for you.

 

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.