Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Dec 11 2004 9:44 PM by mcgdog. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
mcgdog  +  60846 Sat, 11 Dec 04 09:44 PM
Am I correct in assuming that in order to know the possessive plural of a word you must know the plural first? If I am correct then what is the plural possessive of foxes? Would it be foxes'? What about ladies, would it be ladies'? Children would be children's? Cities would be cities'. lemmeno thanks
Joined on Sat, Dec 11 2004
New Member 01
asdf  +  60850 Sat, 11 Dec 04 10:20 PM
Yes, one must know when the word in question is plural.

The three basic rules for apostrophe usage cover most situations:

(1) singular - add 's
(2) plural ending in s - add '
(3) plural not ending in s - add 's
Joined on Sun, Oct 29 2006
Junior Member 70
The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.