We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Jul 31 2006 3:26 AM by Philip. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Grammarian-bot  +  249569 Thu, 27 Jul 06 09:54 PM

Does the rules of punctuation for a list/series of adjectives are different from that for a list/series of nouns.

eg, The dancers were tall, slender and graceful. (Should a comma precede and )

Today John, Mike, and Chester were present in the classroom.

GB

Joined on Sun, May 7 2006
PAKISTAN
Full Member 449
The best way to learn is to learn from your mistakes.
Grammar Geek  +  249571 Thu, 27 Jul 06 10:00 PM

Hi Grammarian-bot,

The "serial" or "Oxford" comma is the one that goes after the last element in a list before the word "and." So in your examples above, John, Mike, and Chester have the serial/Oxford comma and the tall, slender and graceful does not.

There are people who will argue with passion that you should always have one (I'm actually one of them) and those who say that unless it is absoultely required for clarity, to leave it out whenever possible. There is no clear answer, and it is a matter of style, not grammar.

What is clear (to me, anyway) is that you must be consistent - either use it for all lists, both adjectives and nouns, or leave it out, but don't choose one method for one, and one for the other.

(p.s. -Your question should have been "Do the rules" not "Does the rules" because "rules" are plural and requires the plural form of the verb.)

Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member 19,650
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
Grammarian-bot  +  250469 Sun, 30 Jul 06 12:53 PM
Thank you for reply. Well acn you tell me what is the "serial/oxford" comma anyway.

 Grammar Geek wrote:

(p.s. -Your question should have been "Do the rules" not "Does the rules" because "rules" are plural and requires the plural form of the verb.)



Thank you again for correcting me. Well can i use "Are" insted of "Do".
 GB
Grammar Geek  +  250643 Mon, 31 Jul 06 02:59 AM
 Grammar Geek wrote:

The "serial" or "Oxford" comma is the one that goes after the last element in a list before the word "and." So in your examples above, John, Mike, and Chester have the serial/Oxford comma and the tall, slender and graceful does not.

It's the one after Mike.

Philip  +  250646 Mon, 31 Jul 06 03:26 AM
 Grammar Geek wrote:

There are people who will argue with passion that you should always have one (I'm actually one of them) and those who say that unless it is absoultely required for clarity, to leave it out whenever possible. There is no clear answer, and it is a matter of style, not grammar.

In this case, I think of the comma as a substitute for the word 'and'.  Therefore, it is not needed.  Oxford obviously disagrees.  For clarity, I do not hesitate to use it.
Joined on Thu, Jun 23 2005
Veteran Member 8,726
At reise er at leve! - H. C. Andersen
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.