[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Dec 25 2005 8:15 AM by LanguageLover. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Behnazzz  +  173475 Fri, 23 Dec 05 10:08 AM

Many of today's headlines focus on the new alliance with France. The Gazeta Wyborcza newspaper writes "Poland teams up with France against stingy Great Britain". Just two weeks ago, it adds, the Polish Prime Minister Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, told his British counterpart Tony Blair in London, that Poland considers the UK its closest European ally. Now the paper's main headline reads, "We love the French again"

why is it written adds instead of added after the world `ago' wich shows it is in the past?

Elsewhere, a prominent opposition politician, Jan Rokita, says the government shouldn't be afraid of vetoing the budget if Poland is offered less than the 60 billion euros on the table six months ago

.Again in this parts it is said` is offerd' instead of `has offerd' despite the word ago?

can you explain why it is like this please?

thanksSmile [:)]

Joined on Wed, Aug 3 2005
Full Member 225
LanguageLover  +  173484 Fri, 23 Dec 05 11:03 AM

The language of media is a bit different, both in vocabulary and grammar, than the normal writing. One of the differences is the tense, as you've mentioned. If the time of the event, state,... is past, the tense of the sentence is present; if it is past perfect, then the sentence is past; and you can figure out the rest. For example, the verbs in the first paragraph would be in the past tense if it wasn't a part of newspaper article (this also can happen in narrations in a book or story, ...as well), so we would have:

Many of today's headlines focused on the new alliance with France. The Gazeta Wyborcza newspaper wrote "Poland teamed up with France against stingy Great Britain". Just two weeks ago, it added, the Polish Prime Minister Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, had told his British counterpart Tony Blair in London, that Poland considered the UK its closest European ally.

And about "is offered", the sententence is passive, and it was actually "was offered". Hope that it helps.

Joined on Fri, Feb 25 2005
Contributing Member 1,507
The similarities among the languages are more than their differences!
Behnazzz  +  174064 Sat, 24 Dec 05 05:22 PM

Hi

so if it was in past tense,would it be right to say......he said the goverment shouldn't have been afraid of vetoing the budget if poland was offerd lesss than......

LanguageLover  +  174257 Sun, 25 Dec 05 08:15 AM
Had been offered, was offered is already in past tense.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.