wholegrain1) Can "but" be used instead of that when an idea of doubt, fear or distaste?
2) Can "but" mean that...not, therefore "There never is a tax law presented but someone will oppose it" means "There never is a tax law that someone will not oppose"?
Hi, wholegrain.
I think it's a gross oversimplification to say that "but" is substituted for "that" in your example. "That" is just a relative pronoun, while "but" in your example (IMHO) is a conjunction connecting two independent clauses. (I may be all wet!)
I never saw a tax law which/that someone didn't oppose. To me, this is a relative clause, or dependent clause (surely not indepent) where "that" serves as direct object of the verb "to oppose." (In
your example, "to oppose" has its own direct object, "it.")
In you example, "someone will oppose it" is an independent clause, so I'd take "but" as a conjunction. I cant think of another common conjunction or conjunctive phrase which can replace it in this example. The sentence would probably have to be rewritten, as you have done.
Perhaps you realize this: << that.....not, therefore >> , but what you say is a little hard for me to follow. (Does question 1. apply to the example in question 2., or is there no example for question 1. ?)
- A.