Doll
Thanks for taking time to reply me again.
I am a bit confused by your explanation about main clauses and subordinate clauses.
I know very well a main clause is a clause which can stands itself as a meaningful sentence.
You wrote the following:
Is it correct to say he/she is rheumatic? Here, "Is it
correct to say" asks the question. The other thing, I mean, "he/she is
rheumatic is a subordinate clause which explains the main clause. He is rheumatic OR She is rheumatic are complete sentences thus they can stand itself as complete meaningful sentences. So they are main clauses.
The words ' is it correct to say ' do not make sense; thus they can't stand as a meaningul sentence. So the words ' is it correct to say ' are subordinate clause.
Let us take another simple example:If I have the money, I will buy a new car.
The words ' I will buy a new car ' is the main clause here because those words together make a meaningful sentence and they can stand itself.
If I have the money ... [ These words do not make a sensible sentence; so this is the subordinate clause.]
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Let us take another example:1. I trained 90 minutes yesterday.
2. I trained yesterday.
[ I am training at a gym 3 times a week.]My first and second sentences are meaningful ones.
3. When I trained yesterday, I talked to a girl who works as a neurosurgeon.
[ I know her very well. She comes direct from the theatre to train. We often
talk about cancer aspects because she removes brain tumour.]In the third example, the words 'When I trained yesterday' do not make a complete thought. So it is the subordinate clause.
The words ' I talked to a girl who works as a neurosurgeon' are the main clause.
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.