Right word, wrong word

I've found the following sentence in a text written by a non-native speaker of English:

"Later on, it was the metallurgist industry which opened new labour opportunities in the region."

This sounds like a word-by-word translation from Spanish, and "metallurgist industry" just doesn't sound right for some reason.
I know that "labour oportunities" is not correct, but my doubt is about the use of "metallurgist". Is that really a collocation in English? Or what should the text say?
Also, what's the difference between "matallurgist" and metallurgical"?

Thanks in advance,

Miriam

Good question! Let's see if I can answer it.

I've always thought that labour means (apart from "the act of giving birth", which is not my concern here):
1. workers, especially those who do manual work ( as in "cheap labour")
2. tiring physical work (as in "Building roads still involves manual labour")

That's why "labour opportunities" sounds strange to me, while "job opportunities" sounds, if nothing else, more familiar.

So now I have doubts about two parts of the sentence, not just one.

In economics, "labour" is the term given to human resources used in production. I think "labour opportunities" is quite acceptable in that case. The term "labour market" is often used, for instance.

As Ryan noted, "Metallurgist" refers to a practitioner of Metallurgy (the science of manipulating metals and metallic compounds). And I'd agree that "Metals Industry" is probably the best substitute.

Labour is the consequence of having fucked someone with a bit of spicy suffering on the part of one of the workers, not having any consequences for the other part.

samka, ryan, HotWombat, I thank you all!

I found the sentence in question in a short text written by a teacher here in my city. I still don’t like either the sentence I posted here or the whole text. Again, I cannot give you a linguistic or a grammatical explanation for not liking either, it’s more a "feeling" than anything else. To me, the whole thing just doesn’t sound English, it sounds like a bad translation.
I’m including here the whole paragraph in which that sentence appears. It is part of the description of a city in Argentina (Tandil). The layout, spelling, punctuation, etc. are not my work; I’m copying the paragraph word by word from the "original":

"At the moment of its creation, Tandil had 400 citizens (the people who had come with Martín Rodríguez), and today has become a city of 150000. This growth was bigger in certain years, like 1883 when the railroad arrived, the opening of the stone quarries and the beginning of farming and cattle breeding. Later on, it was the metallurgist industry which opened new labor opportunities in the region. During the 70s, the opening of the University had the same effect. Nowadays, what attracts new people is the city’s standard of living."

Once more, thank you for your help

Miriam