This question is Not Answered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
+
20378
Mon, 26 Jan 04 04:44 AM
Hello. I'm looking for a simple answer to which is correct: "I was" or "I were." I hear both in conversation but don't know if there is a hard-and-fast rule for useage, if it varies according to situation, or what.
My confusion lies in that I usually think of "were" belonging to plural nouns and "was" belonging to singular, especially "they were" and "we were"--obviously, you don't say "they was" or "we was" under any circumstance.
And also, one wouldn't say "I were going shopping when I were hit by a car."
I'm asking because MS Word's grammar checker sometimes insists I use "I were" when I think it should be "I was." In this particular instance, I'd typed "I wish I was God" and it insisted it should be "I wish I were God." (No, I don't have a God complex. But if I was--or I were--God, I'd make English less complicated.)
Thanks in advance for the help.
|
|
|
|
|
maj,
5 yr 161 days ago
Don't you think you have enough power already?
|
|
|
|
|
|
buggah
+
20421
Mon, 26 Jan 04 04:04 PM
My advice is to look for subjunctive mood on the Internet.
"subjunctive after wish. Yet another traditional rule requires you to use were rather than was in a contrary-to-fact statement that follows the verb wish: I wish I were (not was) lighter on my feet. Many writers continue to insist on this rule, but the indicative was in such clauses can be found in the works of many well-known writers." (from The American Heritage® Book of English Usage)
Joined on
Sat, Jan 24 2004
Brazil
Full Member
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rommie
+
20424
Mon, 26 Jan 04 04:57 PM
Compare the following two cases:
(1) If he was from another planet ...
(2) If he were from another planet ...
Clause (1) says "He may or may not be from another planet, but let's consider the case in which he, in fact, is". Clause (2), on the other hand, says "He most certainly is NOT from another planet. Ha ha, that's impossible. Still, let's just imagine what would happen if that impossible circumstance were realised".
In other words, you say WERE to imply that the condition is impossible. As in "If I were you...".
Rommie
Joined on
Mon, Jan 26 2004
Earth orbit
Regular Member
606
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous,
1 yr 53 days ago
was or were
In the ordinary past tense of the verb to be, was is the first and third person singular: I was late and were is the second person singular and the plural: You were right. It is not acceptable in standard English to use were for the first and third person singular: I were late, and was for the second person singular and the plural: You was right.
In the past subjunctive, however, the situation is more fluid. Historically the past subjunctive of be is were for all persons, singular and plural: I wish she were here; Suppose I were rich; If only they weren't so expensive. It is quite common, though, to use was instead of were for the first and third person singular: I wish she was here; Suppose I was rich. This is perfectly acceptable in colloquial English, but in formal writing it is better to stick to were. Remember that the fixed phrase as it were cannot be changed – never as it was.
Anonymous,
169 days ago
If you're referring to "If I was" vs "If I were", then they're interchangeable. Many people prefer "If I was" because it goes along with the present tense "I was" rather than adopting the plural. Some celebrities have adopted "If I was", such as Jim Morisson in "Light My Fire".
Anonymous,
165 days ago
Hello you Guest-Person-you! About the use of was vs. were with the subject I. Here is the scoop on that! Normal 0 21 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 ABOUT CONDITIONALS!!! Fundamental Level study of conditionals list four conditionals (First, Second, Third and Zero). Fluency Level study of conditionals list three forms of conditionals (Factual, Predictive and Speculative) with subdivisions in each. The Second Conditionals (Fundamental Level) falls into the subdivision of the Speculative Form (Speculative conditional sentences are used for three purposes: [1] to speculate about unlikely possibilities in the present or future; [2] to speculate about events that did not happen in the past; [3] to speculate about conditions that are contrary to fact). In the UNLIKELY POSSIBILITY subdivision, in the IF CLAUSE, the past-tense form were is used with subjects that would normally take was: ex. Even if I were [not was] invited, I wouldn’t go to the picnic. This is considered standard (as opposed to colloquial) English and should be applied to all writing. Verbally it is possible to use the was instead of were. That´s it, in a nutshell! Daniela ((Email removed))
Anonymous,
159 days ago
Hi, the rule here is not related to "I was" or "I were" but with "wish" structure, which always refers to a plural form of "Be" = "I wish I were there", "I wish you were here", "I wish she were here" and so forth. Best wishes!
|