We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2 3
Share this topic:
This is a discussion thread.
Latest post Wed, Mar 8 2006 6:53 AM by rishonly. 21 replies.
| |
hitchhiker  +  23474 Wed, 25 Feb 04 02:12 AM
This forum is dedicated to continual re-education and our search for a unified and greater understanding of life. It has been started in the hope that we can help each other communicate complicated and controversial subjects in a healthy environment.

We have thousands of people passing through our site daily, from hundreds of different cultures and countries. We have a unique opportunity to structure some good old fashioned debate in a modern interconnected global community.

The rules and guidelines below are here to help you get the most out of our little, hopeful, enterprise.

The englishforums.com team.

You may not be right for this section if you..

-Take things personally.
-Are looking for a fight.
-Are not prepared to concede the possibility that you might be mistaken.
-Are overly religious, political, patriotic, masculine, feminine, irritable.
-Assume the worst about people immediately.
-Don’t take time to read posts before you comment.
-Can’t take criticism.
-Belong to any cult or extremist discipline.
-Are not used to serious, logical debate.

You may be right for this section if you..

-Are diplomatic.
-Like to discuss controversial topics with an engaging, constructively critical and open minded persona.
-Are ready to accept many different viewpoints without being devastated or seriously offended.
-Are able to stand outside of your own world and see yourself from another person’s or culture’s perspective.
-Are ready to identify with any gender, set of politics, nationality or creed.
-Can accept criticism.
-Can give constructive criticism.

The following applies: (IMMEDIATE DELETION)

-The forum guidelines.
-Keep common political, religious, gender specific viewpoints to a minimum.
-No extremist comments.
-No flaming.
-No tempers.
-No sarcasm or touchy/glib comments (for the sake of inter-cultural "translation")
-No personal comments.
-No overly long posts.
-No substantial re-editing of your post, after somebody has replied.
-No drifting off-topic.
-No claiming that the majority of people agree with you (This does not include referencing a "common" morality or perspective for the sake of debate)

Be descriptive, specific, and succinct in your postings. This way your opinion and point is clearly understood and referenced. Remember, people from all over the world read here with English as a second language.

ABSOLUTELY NO FLAME, REACTIONARY OR INTOLERANT RESPONSES WILL BE TOLERATED
Joined on Mon, Nov 18 2002
Richmond, UK
Senior Member 4,034
Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement...
maj  +  23504 Wed, 25 Feb 04 09:11 AM
Hitch, I think having this section is a super wonderful idea. Didn't the Romans have something like that in their school currriculum. However, I think sarcasam was allowed.
maj
Joined on Mon, Mar 31 2003
Senior Member 4,756
hitchhiker  +  23520 Wed, 25 Feb 04 10:11 AM
Sarcasm doesn't translate well though.
Elena  +  23534 Wed, 25 Feb 04 11:06 AM
Hi Hitchhiker and all.

The rules, guidelines and suggestions of this new forum.

I think they are not only rules, guidelines and suggestions. I think they should be part of the textbooks in schools, to be on walls of homes, of work places, in the parks, in the subway, in the buses, taxis, in the personal agendas, in the wallet.

They are not just to the forum, they are for life.

...........how good
Joined on Thu, Jul 31 2003
Regular Member 827
Enjoying my English study
hitchhiker  +  23540 Wed, 25 Feb 04 11:39 AM
Thanks Elena - it's nice to hear from like-minded folk!
Chameleon, 5 yr 271 days ago
thanks for this section! I'm sure we will have many frutiful conversations to come!
rommie  +  25028 Sun, 07 Mar 04 08:36 PM
Might I suggest some extra rules?

I suggest:
- No drifting off-topic
- No claiming that the majority of people agree with you


The latter suggestion is not a dig at any one poster, but what I hope is a sensible strategy for more clearly defined debate in future. You see, it is easy to simply claim the support of the majority - anyone can do that. Politicians do it all the time. However, such claims may never be substantiated. Moreover, it doesn't actually matter whether such claims are accurate or inaccurate, because they will be, in any case, off topic, and irrelevant to the discussion at hand. To claim that most people agree with you is posturing, pure and simple.

And the vast majority of people agree with me about this. Smile [:)]

To the "You may not be right for this section if you.. " section of the rules, may I suggest adding
- are not prepared to concede the possibility that you might be wrong.

Without this, a debate is not a debate, it is simply a stage for soapboxing.

Rommie
Joined on Mon, Jan 26 2004
Earth orbit
Regular Member 606
Conus Lotus  +  25041 Mon, 08 Mar 04 02:24 AM
I agree with Rommies suggested rule about not drifting off topic.
I do not agree with his/her second suggestion because I don't think it would be conducive to free and relevant debate.
Depending on the topic of a given debate a claim that the vast majority of people agree or disagree with something may be entirely relevant, especially if the topic addresses morality (standard of conduct respected by good men independently of positive law and religeon).
I agree with Rommies other comments.
Joined on Wed, Jan 28 2004
Heavenly Lake Namtso, Tibet
Full Member 202
When the hand of the ruler is light, the people do not contrive.
rommie  +  25067 Mon, 08 Mar 04 11:16 AM

But Conus, claims of support are, in general, off topic. And irrelevant to the debate - unless it's actually the topic of that debate. It wasn't so long ago that the majority of humans believed that the Earth was flat - but they were still wrong, weren't they? So, citing majority support on a debate about whether or not the world was flat (back then) would have been a distraction.

The point is that it doesn't MATTER what other people think. They are not the ones debating. They might be wrong too. Let's leave them out of it. If they want their opinions entered into the debate, let them join in and voice their opinions themselves.

Such claims are arguably arragant and assumptive. They can never be proved or disproved. They are often disbelieved. And can you know anyway? Has anyone actually ASKED the entire human race? Such claims provoke arguments, demand proof, etc., etc., and are in any case utterly and completely irrelevant. If you can't talk your way through an argument on its merits then your argument is weak. If you can, then you don't need this distraction.

But I don't set the rules. I just follow them. If and when a decision is taken, I will follow it.

Rommie
1 2 3
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.