We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, May 30 2004 3:57 PM by Guest. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Guest  +  31435 Sun, 30 May 04 03:57 PM
HI----WHERE DO YOU USE S` OR`S AFTER A PERSONS NAME TO DENOTE POSSESSION & PLURALS
EX: JOHN`S OR JOHNS`

THANKS-----------------------------------------MIKE
miriam  +  31498 Mon, 31 May 04 01:49 AM
1. Plural nouns not ending in 's' take both the apostrophe and the 's':
"The children's toys."
"The men's cars."

2. Nouns that take -s for the plural add only the apostrophe to indicate possession (this is called 'zero genitive'):
"The boys' toys."
"The dogs' tails."

3. The 'zero form' is also used:
a. with Greek names of more than one syllable:
"Socrates' wife."
"Euripides' plays."

b. with nouns ending in the sound /z/, in writing only the apostrophe is often used, butthe usual pronunciation seems to be /iz/, as if the 's' were actually there. But there are inconsistencies, and both forms seem to be accepted.
You usually write: "Burns' poems" and "Dickens' plays".
The most common pronunciation, however, seems to be /'b3nziz/ and /'dikinziz/.
(The "i" in these words is supposed to be the English 'short i' sound)

c. In fixed expressions with 'for... sake', the zero form is also used.
"For goodness' sake."

4. All other names ending in a sibilant sound other than /z/ (see 3.b.) have the regular 's genitive:
"Ross's theories."
"Tess's new dress."

A bit messy, isn't it? Smile [:)]

Miriam

Joined on Mon, May 10 2004
Argentina
Regular Member 821
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." Plato
JCB-Boston  +  31751 Tue, 01 Jun 04 09:23 PM
In the case of Burns and Dickens, it is also perfectly correct to add 's, according to some grammarians.

I'm not taking sides here, but this makes the rule much simpler. (I used to teach English in Spain, and believe me, my students always appreciated anything that would simplify things for them!)
Joined on Tue, Jun 1 2004
Boston/New York
New Member 06
Atesttaker  +  31769 Wed, 02 Jun 04 12:06 AM
I agree with Boston . Its hard to follow a response of an expert who uses too much difficult words than who better prefer to be simple in writting.
Joined on Sun, May 23 2004
New Member 19
miriam  +  31785 Wed, 02 Jun 04 04:49 AM
Atesttaker,
I hope you don't mean *I* am the expert? I'm only a teacher.

I'm sorry you find the rules confusing or difficult to understand, but you'll find the same rules in any fairly good grammar book. I didn't make them up. I had to study these rules too, in order to speak/write "educated" English. And I think it was worth both the time and the effort. Smile [:)]

Miriam

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3614.32638. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.