We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
This is a discussion thread.
Latest post Fri, Jul 23 2004 1:34 AM by prabeersikdar. 2 replies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prabeersikdar
+
38810
Fri, 23 Jul 04 01:34 AM
Should the security council be expanded in the light of India and Pakistan becoming nuclear powers?
Joined on
Tue, Jul 6 2004
New Member
40
|
|
|
|
|
job44,
5 yr 99 days ago
The security council is ineffective and should therefore be scrapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
matthewg
+
45605
Wed, 15 Sep 04 12:42 AM
Pakistan is a member of the UN Security Council.
It would only give more incentive for countries to develop nuclear weapons if doing so made one part of the Security Council. The council is a post-WWII relic, designed to give a feeling of glory and achievement to the victors of WWII. Nowadays, it is irrellevant. Countries like France and Russia (permanent members of the security council) are hardly capable of maintaining world security.
Joined on
Mon, Sep 6 2004
Full Member
395
|
|
|
|
|
|