seem

1 2
   Share on Facebook  
Hunk  #173246  Thu, 22 Dec 05 03:11 PM

I have doubts on the usage of "seem".

Is "It seems a nice house" valid? Therefore "She seems perfection" gramatically correct?

Usually "seem"  is followed by a "to"- It seems to be a nice house, She seems (to be) perfect. But I read "seem perfection" in a book.

Thanks.

 

  
Not Ranked
Joined on Fri, Dec 16 2005
New Member (33)
pieanne  #173278  Thu, 22 Dec 05 04:36 PM

It's true you don't have to use "to be" after "seem".

I would rather say "the house seems nice", and "she seems perfect", but I you can see, I'm not a native, so you'd better wait till a native gives her/his opinion on this.

 

  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jan 20 2005
South of France ...But I'm Belgian!
Veteran Member (7,512)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
I'm glad to help, but I'm not a native! And please excuse my typos...
Hunk  #173431  Fri, 23 Dec 05 07:19 AM
Thank you very much, pieanne; I too hope someone would give me a firm answer on this one.
  
paco2004  #173437  Fri, 23 Dec 05 08:09 AM

(x) He seems a scholar. (o) He seems to be a scholar.
(o) He seems a great scholar. (o) He seems to be a great scholar.
(o) She seems happy. (o) She seems to be happy. [o happier]
(x) She seems single. (o) She seems to be single. [x more single]
(o) It seems perfection. (?) It seems to be perfection.
 
I don't know why they are so.

paco

  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Nov 17 2004
Senior Member (4,095)
In Japan today even dogs are learning how to bow-wow in English.
MrPedantic  #173749  Sat, 24 Dec 05 02:10 AM

"It seems a nice house" is fine. (Here the speaker has an air of reserving judgement; whereas "The house seems nice" is more positive.)

"She seems perfection" is fine too, but literary.

MrP

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member (12,053)
Proficient SpeakerSystemAdministrator
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
paco2004  #173766  Sat, 24 Dec 05 03:00 AM
Could anyone give us any info about when or where we could delete "to be" from <seem to be+ complement word>?

paco
  
MrPedantic  #174192  Sun, 25 Dec 05 01:06 AM

I'm struggling to find a "rule" here, Paco! Cf. these common phrases:

1. That seems to be the case.

2. That seems to be true.

3. That seems likely.

4. That seems like a good idea.

5. That seems a good idea.

6. She seems a nice girl.

7. It seems quite easy.

8. It seems to be someone else's hat.

9. It seems the best thing to do.

All I can say is that "she seems (to be) perfection" would seem unusual in either form!

MrP

  
paco2004  #174208  Sun, 25 Dec 05 02:14 AM
Hello Mr P

Thank you for the kind reply and I am sorry for bothering you with this problem. I myself thought a bit about it and looked for any hints to solve it in my grammar books, but the efforts ended rather in vain. Although even CGEL didn't mention anything about it, one of my E-J dictionaries says something as follows.

[1] When the complement is a gradable adjective, "to be" can be omitted. But the adjective is un-gradable, we cannot delete "to be". Thus:
        (EX-1) The house seems (to be) big.  (EX-2) The house seems to be two-storied.
[2] In the case a noun is the complement and when it is modified by a gradable adjective, "to be" is often deleted. But otherwise, noun complements mostly require "to be".
        (EX-3) It seems (to be) a big house. (EX-4) It seems to be a two-storied house.
[3] When the case when the noun is an abstract noun implying some gradable quality, "to be" can be omitted exceptionally.
        (EX-5) It seems (to be) nonsense. (EX-6) It seems (to be) perfection.
        (EX-7) Time's pace is hard that it seems (to be) the length of seven years.
        (EX-8) It seems (to be) years to me since I have seen you.
        (EX-9) It seems (to be) simplicity itself.

I don't know what literature the dictionary editors found these rules in, but when I checked them googlily, they seems to be in good agreement with actual uses as a whole. But there are some cases where I cannot get why "to be" can be deleted.
       (EX-10) As to Hawaii, it seems a foregone conclusion that annexation will be recommended.
       (EX-11) It seems merely a waste of men and money to prolong the struggle.

Anyway what I am puzzled at is why the gradability of complements is related to the deletability of "to be". Have you any idea about it?

paco
  
MrPedantic  #175806  Thu, 29 Dec 05 12:29 AM

It puzzles me too.

But I take off my hat to your "googlily".

MrP

  
1 2
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service