Sentence analysis

1 2 3 4 5
   Share on Facebook  
CalifJim  #76331  Thu, 24 Feb 05 05:33 PM
She wasn't impressed (verb)
She was unimpressed (adjective)
I'm not convinced. I remain unconvinced that "impressed" is a verb in the first sentence.

Note that verbs don't take "very": *He was very shot at dawn.

And yet we have the perfectly fine "She wasn't very impressed". Smile [:)]

CJ
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,792)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
MrPedantic  #76334  Thu, 24 Feb 05 05:45 PM
Actually, I'm not sure I can hear 'impressed/unimpressed/not impressed' any more. I'm slightly puzzled by my own comments.

I may have to take them off the shelves for a while.

MrP
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Oct 13 2004
Veteran Member (12,168)
Proficient SpeakerSystemAdministrator
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
paco2004  #76363  Thu, 24 Feb 05 10:12 PM
Hello

I consulted with OED and Webster and found the description is in agreement to CJ's comment.

To summarize the description, the senses of the verb 'impress' are sorted into two categories.
1) physically impress .. to exert pressures on something (to make a mark)
2) mentally impress ... to affect someone's mind (give a strong impression)

The adjective "impressed" can be either "physically impressed" or "mentally impressed".
But the adjective "unimpressed" is always "mentally unimpressed".
(Ex) He did this sort of thing remarkably. But she was quite unimpressed.

The phrase "be impressed" in the mental sense seems to be taken either as a passive construct or as [be + adj] depending on the context. And it can be followed by 'by' and ''with'.
(Ex) I could not be but solemnly impressed by the appearance of the temple.
(Ex) I am very impressed with your exceptional customer service.

"Be impressed by a person/persons" is rarely used, although I found some on the web
(Ex) There is no question that they were impressed by President Bush personally.
(Ex) I was impressed by every salesperson with whom I came in contact via E-mail.

paco
  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Nov 17 2004
Senior Member (4,095)
In Japan today even dogs are learning how to bow-wow in English.
MrPedantic  #76367  Thu, 24 Feb 05 10:55 PM
Hello Hela

I would qualify my previous remarks a little – now I read the two versions as follows:

1. 'The girls were impressed with Max's friendly approach.'
– any time after the approach, e.g. when they're discussing Max later.

2. 'The girls were impressed by Max's friendly approach.'
– either at the time of the approach, or quite soon after.

I have a sense of a longer 'state of being impressed' in #1.

Thanks for your comments, Paco – I'd begun to think I'd imagined 'impressed with'.

MrP
  
CalifJim  #76422  Fri, 25 Feb 05 03:16 AM
And Billy Budd was impressed by pirates, wasn't he? Or by some government or other? I forget. He was impressed, however, not 'very impressed', i.e., it's a verb!

Smile [:)]
  
Casi  #76479  Fri, 25 Feb 05 11:18 AM
Cas wrote:
She wasn't impressed (verb)
She was unimpressed (adjective)


I'm not convinced. / . . . that "impressed" is a verb in the first sentence.
CJ


Neither am I. Allow me to add in the essentials:

She wasn't impressed (verb)
She was unimpressed (adjective)

"not" attaches to the aux and "un-" to the participle.

Sorry for the confusion.
  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Sep 25 2004
Regular Member (547)
Proficient Speaker
Hela  #77874  Wed, 02 Mar 05 06:53 PM
Dear teachers,

What do you think of the following analysis, is it correct ?

The children looked at the boy inquisitively.

FORM: FUNCTION:

The children = noun phrase subject
looked at = verb phrase transitive (phrasal) verb (?)
the boy = noun phrase direct object
inquisitively = adverb phrase adverbial of manner

"at the boy" cannot be considered as an adverbial of place, can it?

Many thanks,
Hela
  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 15 2004
Tunisia
Regular Member (831)
equivocal  #77886  Wed, 02 Mar 05 07:45 PM
1. She wasn't impressed
2. She was unimpressed
3. She impressed them.
4. *She unimpressed them.

I propose that 1 and 2 contain verbs in passive form with a null subject. 3 contains a verb in active form. 4 is ungrammatical because english doesn't have the negative counterpart of the verb impress. You can verify this:

1a. She wasn't very impressed (by the show)
1b. The show didn't impress her.
2a. She was totally unimpressed (by the show)
2b. *The show totally unimpressed her.

Note the oddity that verbs usually don't take very:

3a. *She very impressed them.
3b. She easily/quickly/totally impressed them.

3b is okay with an adverb but not with an intensifier.

The adjectival counterpart is "impressive" and the adverbial counterpart "impressively":

4. The impressive performance impressed her.
5. The impressively performed show impressed her.

Impressed belongs to a special class of known as "amuse" verbs that allow null subjects in their passive construction. In the process they take on some properties of adjectives. They are not adjectives however because they need to be verbs in order to be passivised. Take for example a pure adjective:

6a. She was happy.
6b. Happy was she.
6c. *Happy was she by the show

The verbs in this class consist of words like: amuse, enchant, mesmerise, hypnotised etc. A non-exhaustive list can be found here in Joanis' paper:

[link]

Hope this helpsSmile [:)]
  
Not Ranked
Joined on Tue, Mar 1 2005
Junior Member (58)
CalifJim  #77958  Thu, 03 Mar 05 01:46 AM
passive form with a null subject


In "She wasn't impressed", "She" seems to be the subject. Can you explain "null subject"? Are you talking about theta-roles?
  
1 2 3 4 5
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service