We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Mar 30 2009 10:16 AM by MrPernickety. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
MrPernickety  +  691868 Sat, 28 Mar 09 11:37 AM

Hi,

Could you tell me if this sentences are correct and make sense ?

1. I'll have you up on hindering procecution

2. I'll have you up on aggravated assault

If yes, do they mean that I'll charge somebody with aggravated assault/hindering prosecution ?

 

Thanks !

Joined on Sat, Oct 25 2008
Regular Member 731
Amendment XXX to the US Constitution: No man shall be held accountable for any promise he makes while drunk unless it was a bet.
MrPedantic  +  691871 Sat, 28 Mar 09 11:53 AM
Hello MrP,

The structure is indeed "I'll have you up on (a charge of) XYZ". In the first example, I would be more inclined to say "obstructing the police in their enquiries".

Best wishes,

MrP
Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 12,592
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
Anonymous, 238 days ago
Hi, 

I'm a student teacher of English

Doesn't the expression go, 'to have up + for?

Bye
MrPedantic  +  692334 Sun, 29 Mar 09 10:52 PM
Hello Anon,

Yes, "to have someone up for something" is a good idiom.

Good luck with the course!

All the best,

MrP
MrPernickety  +  692447 Mon, 30 Mar 09 10:16 AM

Hi, MrP

Thank you ever so much! Smile

Take care,

MrP.

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.