While I understand the rules for handling
misplaced/dangling participial phrases at the beginning of a sentence, I'm more
than a bit fuzzy on the rules for sentence-ending phrases. I have
reviewed several grammar texts, but most avoid the subject altogether.
The Writer's Digest Grammar Desk Reference gave misplaced/dangling modifiers
brief consideration, but their explanation left me with more questions than
answers.
Question:
Is it a hard and fast rule that a modifier (word, phrase, or clause) is misplaced
if it is not directly before or after the noun it is intended to modify?
While Writer's Digest suggests that as a rule, it doesn't seem to make sense when applied
to sentences with direct objects. In each example below the meaning (I
think) is clear. The participial phrase refers to the subject noun
instead of the closer direct object noun. The order could be rearranged
to bring the phrase closer to the subject, but the result would sound stilted.
Thanks in advance for any help on this subject!
Examples:
John ate the last piece of cake, savoring each delicious bite.
The robber turned the corner, running into an off duty police officer.
Sara placed each of the scrolls in her backpack, giving each message its due
reverence.