We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2 3
Share this topic:
Yoong Liat  +  807931 Sun, 05 Jul 09 11:13 PM
I'm more concerned with fragments, not meaningless sentence. 


To me, "I am" without context is not a meaningless sentence. It is a fragment.

Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
Veteran Member 6,757
Avangi  +  807954 Sun, 05 Jul 09 11:31 PM
1. I did.


2. a. Who knocked?

    b. I did.


How do I explain to the original poster that 2. b. is a sentence, but 1. is not?

Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member 8,180
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
Yoong Liat  +  808029 Mon, 06 Jul 09 01:12 AM
Avangi
“1. I did.


2. a. Who knocked?

    b. I did.


How do I explain to the original poster that 2. b. is a sentence, but 1. is not?

1.  I did is meaningless without context.


 2. a. Who knocked?

     b. I did.. (I did answers the question Who knocked? Who knocked?  constiitutes the context.)


I am  is meaningless. I am what I am is a sentence.

Avangi  +  808134 Mon, 06 Jul 09 03:02 AM
Perhaps I worry too much about definitions.  The original poster wanted to know if his examples were sentences or phrases.  My understanding is that any group of words is a phrase.  Well, I guess that get's qualified by "which go together," which seems a bit loose.

I think that all sentences are phrases, but not all phrases are sentences.  I don't know much about fragments.  I suppose they too are phrases.  I don't know if the words in a fragment have to go together. I suppose both fragments and phrases could be qualified as potential parts of grammatical sentences.  Of course sentences which are grammatical may not make sense, so we'd say they're not idiomatic.


I believe you're saying that there's no such thing as a sentence which doesn't make sense.  The reason for this is that by definition, a sentence must make sense.


So by your definition, we should stop saying, "Your sentence is grammatical, but it's incorrect because it's not idiomatic." 

AlpheccaStars  +  808165 Mon, 06 Jul 09 03:36 AM
I agree with Avangi. 


I am. He is. We are. She did.  etc.  are sentences.


The context and word count is not relevant to the grammatical definition of a sentence. If a group of words is a sentence in one context, it is a sentence in all contexts.


This is a sentence, too:

Eat!



This is a fragment:

If I go to the supermarket in my car with my brother and your sister on Saturday afternoon.


Cheers,

A-s

Joined on Sun, Oct 12 2008
Senior Member 3,508
The pen is mightier than the sword. Edward Bulwer-Lytton (1803-1873)
Avangi  +  808356 Mon, 06 Jul 09 06:38 AM
Thanks, A's. 
Soka  +  809046 Mon, 06 Jul 09 05:01 PM
According to the Ofxord Dictionary & Thesaurus (2007 edition), a  sentence is a gramatically complete series of words with (implied ) subject and predicate, and expresses a complete thought .

 

Now if I say this : 'I am'. ; does this express a complete thought ?

If yes, then could you please explain that 'complete thought' to me ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joined on Mon, Dec 10 2007
Full Member 186
The Lord prefers common-looking people.That is why he makes so many of them.
Avangi  +  809111 Mon, 06 Jul 09 05:58 PM
I exist.


It's not a lot different from, "I am I, Don Quixote."

"Don Quixote" is an appositive, which means it can be eliminiated without changing the essential meaning of the sentence.

Therefore, "I am I," is a sentence.


Cogito, ergo sum.  Here too, you can eliminate either one of the independent clauses.

"I think," is a sentence.  "I am" is a sentence.

If "I think, therefore I am," is a sentence, so is "I think, and I am."


It's a little more difficult to justify "I do" on these grounds, but still possible.


Clearly, "to be" means "to exist," apart from it's use in expressions like "I am dumb."

But does "do" have a meaning in its own right?


Consider the adage, "Those who can't do, teach."

So I may say, "I can do."

Therefore, I can say, "I do."

AlpheccaStars  +  809144 Mon, 06 Jul 09 06:36 PM
Avangi
“Therefore, I can say, "I do."


Do you take this woman to be your lawful wedded wife?


I don't know of anyone who would debate that the answer does not express a complete thought!


Cheers,

A-s

1 2 3
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.