We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Oct 8 2006 8:42 AM by Anonymous. 6 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Tung Quoc  +  277481 Sat, 07 Oct 06 04:59 PM

You should do well on the test.

should here expresses advisability or degree of certainty or both? If not both, how to distinguish advisability or degree of certainty in this case?

Q

 
Joined on Sun, Sep 17 2006
Regular Member 870
Marius Hancu  +  277483 Sat, 07 Oct 06 05:02 PM
 Tung Quoc wrote:

You should do well on the test.

should here expresses advisability or degree of certainty or both? If not both, how to distinguish advisability or degree of certainty in this case?

Q

 
Both. You need more context for clear separation.
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Veteran Member 11,673
Yoong Liat  +  277498 Sat, 07 Oct 06 05:35 PM

Hi Marius

You should do well on the test.

You should do well in the test.

Should the preposition be 'in' instead of 'on? Or are both acceptable?

Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
Veteran Member 6,757
J Lewis  +  277503 Sat, 07 Oct 06 05:54 PM
I prefer "in".

If someone says to me You should do well in the test, my immediate interpretation is that the speaker considers I have studied well enough. He could say You will do well, but nobody is ever sure.

Also interpretable as advisability, but here I'd be inclined to put it more strongly: You must do well in the test.
Joined on Tue, Sep 5 2006
Italy
Regular Member 518
milky  +  277706 Sun, 08 Oct 06 07:58 AM
 Tung Quoc wrote:

You should do well on the test.

should here expresses advisability or degree of certainty or both? If not both, how to distinguish advisability or degree of certainty in this case?

Q

 

I'd say certainty. If it were advisability, I'd expect to see/hear "you should try to".

Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
Anonymous, 3 yr 46 days ago
To be 100% about the intended meaning of should, you often need more context.
However, I agree with Milky in this case:  should seems to suggest certainty in the sentence. 
If it were advisability, the sentence would normally be worded a little differently.

As regards the prepostition:
I have a sneaking suspicion this may be one of those BE/AmE things:  I'd definitely say 'on the test'. Angel [A]
J Lewis, 3 yr 46 days ago
Good point, Milky
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.